Originally posted by xoggoth
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Pakistan
Collapse
X
-
Just deliberately mass bombed civilian targets using incendiary ordinance, the children were only collateral damage... -
Well okay, we deliberately targeted civilians knowing full well a proportion of them would be children.Originally posted by xoggoth View PostThere are always civilian casualties in wars but we did not deliberately target children.Will work inside IR35. Or for food.Comment
-
I think people get upset because torture is abhorrent and gains very little. Complaining that enemy is sub-human and then using that excuse to act like wild animals ourselves is just pathetic.Originally posted by minestrone View PostAnd people get upset when we pour water over their faces when we catch themComment
-
Originally posted by Jog On View PostIt's in response to the Pakistani army fighting against the Taliban.
The victims are children of Pakistani army soldiers as the target is an army school.Ok, makes sense (from their POV anyway). Thanks.Originally posted by VectraMan View PostI assume they did it because it was an army run school, with presumably children of soldiers and they're hoping to discourage people from fighting against them by targeting their children.Comment
-
There is still a humungous difference between targeting war-effort factories, knowing that some bombs would go astray and probably kill children - and the outright targeting of children.Originally posted by sal View PostJust deliberately mass bombed civilian targets using incendiary ordinance, the children were only collateral damage...
Even with collateral damage caused by drone strikes etc., it's not like the Yanks say "right, let's try to kill as many children as we possibly can today - let's try and slaughter every last little kiddie we can" - that's precisely what the Taleban said when they woke up this morning.Comment
-
ThisOriginally posted by centurian View PostThere is still a humungous difference between targeting war-effort factories, knowing that some bombs would go astray and probably kill children - and the outright targeting of children.
Even with collateral damage caused by drone strikes etc., it's not like the Yanks say "right, let's try to kill as many children as we possibly can today - let's try and slaughter every last little kiddie we can" - that's precisely what the Taleban said when they woke up this morning.
I know a very small number of guys who have come back from Afghanistan and they say that the rules of engagement are so strict that often they put the guys in danger.
Whereas the other side did not give a damn and would deliberately engage in public areas to reduce the effectiveness of our troops.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36

Comment