Originally posted by xoggoth
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Pakistan
Collapse
X
-
Just deliberately mass bombed civilian targets using incendiary ordinance, the children were only collateral damage... -
Well okay, we deliberately targeted civilians knowing full well a proportion of them would be children.Originally posted by xoggoth View PostThere are always civilian casualties in wars but we did not deliberately target children.Will work inside IR35. Or for food.Comment
-
I think people get upset because torture is abhorrent and gains very little. Complaining that enemy is sub-human and then using that excuse to act like wild animals ourselves is just pathetic.Originally posted by minestrone View PostAnd people get upset when we pour water over their faces when we catch themComment
-
Originally posted by Jog On View PostIt's in response to the Pakistani army fighting against the Taliban.
The victims are children of Pakistani army soldiers as the target is an army school.Ok, makes sense (from their POV anyway). Thanks.Originally posted by VectraMan View PostI assume they did it because it was an army run school, with presumably children of soldiers and they're hoping to discourage people from fighting against them by targeting their children.Comment
-
There is still a humungous difference between targeting war-effort factories, knowing that some bombs would go astray and probably kill children - and the outright targeting of children.Originally posted by sal View PostJust deliberately mass bombed civilian targets using incendiary ordinance, the children were only collateral damage...
Even with collateral damage caused by drone strikes etc., it's not like the Yanks say "right, let's try to kill as many children as we possibly can today - let's try and slaughter every last little kiddie we can" - that's precisely what the Taleban said when they woke up this morning.Comment
-
ThisOriginally posted by centurian View PostThere is still a humungous difference between targeting war-effort factories, knowing that some bombs would go astray and probably kill children - and the outright targeting of children.
Even with collateral damage caused by drone strikes etc., it's not like the Yanks say "right, let's try to kill as many children as we possibly can today - let's try and slaughter every last little kiddie we can" - that's precisely what the Taleban said when they woke up this morning.
I know a very small number of guys who have come back from Afghanistan and they say that the rules of engagement are so strict that often they put the guys in danger.
Whereas the other side did not give a damn and would deliberately engage in public areas to reduce the effectiveness of our troops.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Is HMRC ‘cruelly seeking to transfer debts’ to MSC contractors? Today 06:37
- IT contractor demand climbed in August 2026 to 40-month high Sep 25 04:53
- 5 steps before your client ‘does a Foreign Office’ and puts 90% of contractors inside IR35 Sep 24 01:11
- Luke’s Story: “I knew it was a loan. But they changed the rules.” Sep 23 00:00
- I registered my company with my home address. Whoops. Here's what Companies House shows the world about you Sep 22 13:06
- The Tories’ three IR35 replacement options — but contractors are right to be sceptical Sep 22 03:51
- Conservatives to replace IR35 outright, Griffith vows — advisers who met him reveal what it should contain Sep 21 05:06
- HMRC’s tax calculation errors: why contractors must check their bill now Sep 17 05:14
- HMRC names 12 loan charge-type schemes, one with ‘Tardis’ clause Sep 15 00:12
- Inside IR35 contractors as zero-hours reform victims is why Kate Dearden must meet us Sep 14 06:37

Comment