Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Nobody claimed the Nepal catastophe was caused by global warming, however there is nothing loony about the idea of seismic events being triggered by changes in glaciation or hydrology ...
Predictably, the Green eco-loons are linking the horrible earthquake in Nepal with climate change
I wonder what on earth is not caused by it
Ok, that really is bloody stupid.
There's a reason the Himalayas are there and as high as they are and getting higher, also why the whole region is prone to FOGB quakes and always has been since India hit Asia.
There's a reason the Himalayas are there and as high as they are and getting higher, also why the whole region is prone to FOGB quakes and always has been since India hit Asia.
Nobody claimed the Nepal catastophe was caused by global warming. Surely you've got used to EO's little 'embellishments' by now?
This paper says something pretty significant, regardless of when it was published.
Most relevant scientific papers are older than one year.
Non-scientists often naively confuse journalism and science assuming anything that wasn't immediately published is irrelevant, i.e. scoffing at a paper because it wasn't published yesterday in the same way you might scoff at an out of date newspaper.
Comment