• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

The unacceptable face of capitalism

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #61
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    Everything 'works' in that it produces an outcome. Whether that outcome is desirable is a different matter. Feudalism 'worked'.
    There's a tacit understanding here of what that desirable outcome is. The problem is that people who claim that capitalism doesn't work in certain markets tend not to understand capitalism or basic economics, and that ignorance causes them to empower people to commit fraud, and sabotages the market's potential to deliver optimal results.

    Comment


      #62
      Originally posted by SpontaneousOrder View Post
      Human capital.
      Nice try but fail.

      capitalist
      Line breaks: cap¦it¦al|ist
      Pronunciation: /ˈkapɪt(ə)lɪst /
      NOUN

      A person who uses their wealth to invest in trade and industry for profit in accordance with the principles of capitalism:
      capitalist: definition of capitalist in Oxford dictionary (British & World English)

      IT contractors make their living by selling their labour, so are workers, even if they are privileged workers.

      Comment


        #63
        Originally posted by SpontaneousOrder View Post
        There's a tacit understanding here of what that desirable outcome is. The problem is that people who claim that capitalism doesn't work in certain markets tend not to understand capitalism or basic economics, and that ignorance causes them to empower people to commit fraud, and sabotages the market's potential to deliver optimal results.
        But different people have a different view of what a desirable outcome is.

        Optimal results for whom?

        Comment


          #64
          Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
          Nice try but fail.



          capitalist: definition of capitalist in Oxford dictionary (British & World English)

          IT contractors make their living by selling their labour, so are workers, even if they are privileged workers.
          Where is the contradiction?

          Comment


            #65
            Originally posted by SpontaneousOrder View Post
            Where is the contradiction?
            Do you know the difference between a capitalist and a worker?

            Comment


              #66
              Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
              But different people have a different view of what a desirable outcome is.
              If that's a valid argument, then it also invalidates the idea that the state must restrict the 'extremes' of capitalism. To what end? when different peopel have different views?

              Comment


                #67
                Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
                Do you know the difference between a capitalist and a worker?
                It's a false dichotomy.

                Comment


                  #68
                  Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
                  You seem to be confusing free trade with capitalism. Look at the relationship in any society between labour and capital and then you will understand whether it is a slave society, a feudalist society, a capitalist society or something else.
                  I'm not - but free trade (of goods, services, labour, or anything else a man might voluntarily trade with another) is a prerequisite. When you restrict a man's freedom to trade, or not trade - then you kill capitalism. When a deal is a bad one, men must be free to not make that trade - the state prevents that in many cases.

                  QE wouldn't be a problem if we were free to not participate in the current fiat paradigm. But we're not, and as such we're robbed of wealth every time the state prints another pound.

                  Comment


                    #69
                    Originally posted by SpontaneousOrder View Post
                    It's a false dichotomy.
                    It's not even a dichotomy you silly.

                    But... can you tell the difference between the investment of capital for a return and the selling of labour for a wage?

                    Comment


                      #70
                      Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
                      Do you know the difference between a capitalist and a worker?
                      I am sure Bernard Manning told that one - remind me of the punchline please.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X