• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

'Statistically significant' rise in net migration to UK

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by minestrone View Post
    I don't think they would, it is inline with the current UK net migration.
    Indeed.

    Scotland (proposed)
    24,000 / 5,327,700 = 0.0045

    UK (current)
    243,000 / 64,100,000 = 0.0038

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by minestrone View Post
      An independent Scotland will have a migration target of 24k.
      Originally posted by scooterscot View Post
      Many in UKIP / English folks would spontaneously combust with excitement at the thought of such a statistic.
      Originally posted by Bunk View Post
      That's proportionately higher than it is at the moment
      Originally posted by minestrone View Post
      I don't think they would, it is inline with the current UK net migration.
      Originally posted by Bunk View Post
      Indeed.

      Scotland (proposed)
      24,000 / 5,327,700 = 0.0045

      UK (current)
      243,000 / 64,100,000 = 0.0038
      Ah, the wonderful sound of bulltulip being splattered against a wall of fact.
      And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

      Comment


        #13
        I wonder if after a YES vote, David Cameron will declare victory after reducing net migration to something like: minus 5 million.

        Comment


          #14

          Comment


            #15
            there is a tipping point in terms of the benefits that migration brings, think we are at it now:

            BBC News - Primary school places budget squeeze

            The liberals will tell you its all good and the additional taxes enable new infrastructure projects to support the growing populous blah blah blah. However schools and hospitals aren't built in a week, there is a lag of years before we can cater for the uplift, by which time its moved again. Continual tail chasing.

            When net migration figures are used to provide a population forecast and associated infrastructure projects and they are wrong, then guess what happens. Social Services cant cope with the demand. That is then compounded by the unfactored migrants also having children.

            Quicker we get out of Europe the better IMHO, this freedom of movement isn't working and I think we are better risking trade agreements than battling on trying to cater for everyone to come here. The economy cant cope in terms of funding, social services cant cope in terms of capacity.

            Its ridiculous, Farage really does have a point and Im not surprised he is mixing it with the big boys.

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by CheeseSlice View Post
              I wonder if after a YES vote, David Cameron will declare victory after reducing net migration to something like: minus 5 million.
              I wonder how the presiding PM will feel during the break up of a country under his premiership.

              Not exactly a way to go down in history.
              "Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience". Mark Twain

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by smalldog View Post
                Quicker we get out of Europe the better IMHO, this freedom of movement isn't working
                Arguably it IS working very well for businesses in Europe.
                And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
                  Arguably it IS working very well for businesses in Europe.
                  For legitimate yes Its working well. For my startup for example, we have a mixed workforce with probably about 30% non-UK European nationals. These people would still work here if we left Europe, just require work permit/sponsorship, no different to the Asian guy we have working here we sponsored.

                  Its also great for the companies who cant get some of the lazy, benefit claiming good for nothing UK nationals to do menial jobs, I agree.

                  Worst thing is its brilliant for black market employment and the greedy companies who dont want to play by the rules and who pay below minimum wage and off the books to former eastern block nationals who will work for breadcrumbs. Which obviously isnt good for the economy as its off radar and not taxed so not supporting social services. Of course the migrants will take these illegal jobs, they are banned from receiving benefits initially. I really dont blame them for coming here, I would if it was my families future.
                  Last edited by smalldog; 28 August 2014, 15:26.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by smalldog View Post
                    These people would still work here if we left Europe, just require work permit/sponsorship,
                    Britain's civil servants are hardly even capable of renewing passports of UK citizens in the space of 5 months; what makes you think they could process tens or even hundreds of thousands of work permit applications from UK employers or European employees within the time frame required by business, i.e. days?
                    And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
                      Britain's civil servants are hardly even capable of renewing passports of UK citizens in the space of 5 months; what makes you think they could process tens or even hundreds of thousands of work permit applications from UK employers or European employees within the time frame required by business, i.e. days?
                      no such thing as a perfect solution, granted there would need to be bolstering in areas to cope with the uplift which is why permits are chargeable.
                      Last edited by smalldog; 28 August 2014, 15:40.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X