I seem to remember some discussions about disparities between Client - Agency (C-A) contracts and Agency - Contractor (A-C) contracts. We push hard to have our contracts showing us to be outside IR35 but the problem is it is the agency that are making the changes and they don't really know. Knowing what is in the C-A contract could severely dent your perceived status. e.g. the agent agrees to amend the Sub clause to make it IR friendly in the A-C contractbut the C-A contract hasn't changed. HMRC will come along and use the C-A agreement to trump yours.
Now forgive me if I am wrong but wasn't it mentioned that you can defend your contract if you have done everything to make sure it matches your working practices but if you have seen the C-A and it is missing key IR35 points or the changes you asked your contract stands for nothing and can't be defended. I can't remember the exact discussion but seem think seeing the C-A one wasn't that good for you?
Anyone remember that discussion or point out what the real situation was if my explanation is wrong?
EDIT : Ah **** it. Looks like I am wrong again. Found this article on it, which wasn't the one I was thinking of but anyway, at the end it says it would be great to see the C-A so my thought must be wrong. Saying that... I am sure many contractors would get a shock and would have to re-think their IR35 status if they did! Am thinking of PC's recent comment when he got the agent to put in a sub clause even though the agent said there is no chance they would have that.
Now forgive me if I am wrong but wasn't it mentioned that you can defend your contract if you have done everything to make sure it matches your working practices but if you have seen the C-A and it is missing key IR35 points or the changes you asked your contract stands for nothing and can't be defended. I can't remember the exact discussion but seem think seeing the C-A one wasn't that good for you?
Anyone remember that discussion or point out what the real situation was if my explanation is wrong?
EDIT : Ah **** it. Looks like I am wrong again. Found this article on it, which wasn't the one I was thinking of but anyway, at the end it says it would be great to see the C-A so my thought must be wrong. Saying that... I am sure many contractors would get a shock and would have to re-think their IR35 status if they did! Am thinking of PC's recent comment when he got the agent to put in a sub clause even though the agent said there is no chance they would have that.
Comment