• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Any IR35 implications?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by DirtyDog View Post
    No, it means that you cannot effectively rely on lack of D&C as a defence, which leaves two other branches to use as a defence - lack of MOO and RoS.

    If you can effectively prove one of those two, then that's your defence - you only need one of the three, rather than all three.
    Riiiight and the RoS is gonna work if they have that attitude. But yes you are correct.
    'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!

    Comment

    Working...
    X