I wouldn't sign a contract with that clause, no ands, ifs or buts!!!
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Two Weeks Probation
Collapse
X
-
-
Great feedback, I am impressed with the verbal/email progress report idea so a big thanks for that and the other comments expressed. Actually, I should ask for a 1 week probation as I can absorb the hit and leave early if I believed all is not well and the feedback from existing contractors was negative.
Normally I would have walked out if it had been a (me too) agent with a nobody client, however in this case it involves a large blue chip insurance client and an established agency looking for a few extra resources to catch up on a roll-out project which slipped schedule hence the short duration, and 2 weeks is about a quarter of the assignment if it lasts and this annoyed me a little.
The rate offered is at the top end of the scale. and the contract may lead to other higher level work with the client and the agency, and this is a consideration too.
One thing I forgot to mention is that I will not be working for the client directly but via an outsourced business engaged for this specific project, and they said they had a contractual agreement with the end client to provide resources on these terms.
CheersComment
-
If you're on the bench with no other possibilities then you don't have anything to lose. Would 2 weeks work be useful to them? In most cases it wouldn't be unless it really is a small piece of work like updating a spreadsheet. I would say that this is most likely them covering themselves after a bad experience with a contractor. A company that would defraud contractors wouldn't really get very far.I'm alright JackComment
-
Only you know your situation and how much you need the work and how risk averse you are, so only you can make a decision.
One thing I forgot to mention is that I will not be working for the client directly but via an outsourced business engaged for this specific project, and they said they had a contractual agreement with the end client to provide resources on these terms.Comment
-
Originally posted by BlasterBates View PostIf you're on the bench with no other possibilities then you don't have anything to lose. Would 2 weeks work be useful to them? In most cases it wouldn't be unless it really is a small piece of work like updating a spreadsheet. I would say that this is most likely them covering themselves after a bad experience with a contractor. A company that would defraud contractors wouldn't really get very far.
They did say that only once they had to get rid of a contractor because he was not skilled as per his CV. I would have been much happier if they asked for a technical test but I guess they don't have the time. I am now benched so I suppose I have nothing to lose especially as my skill set is more than a match for the role, it is just that I never heard of this request before.Comment
-
Originally posted by BS1397 View PostThey did say that only once they had to get rid of a contractor because he was not skilled as per his CV. I would have been much happier if they asked for a technical test but I guess they don't have the time. I am now benched so I suppose I have nothing to lose especially as my skill set is more than a match for the role, it is just that I never heard of this request before.Comment
-
Originally posted by BS1397 View PostThey did say that only once they had to get rid of a contractor because he was not skilled as per his CV. I would have been much happier if they asked for a technical test but I guess they don't have the time. I am now benched so I suppose I have nothing to lose especially as my skill set is more than a match for the role, it is just that I never heard of this request before.Comment
-
Around 2000 Goldmine Sucks started doing one week interviews where you would work for a week. But you would be paid whatever.
Going unpaid sounds like a reach around to me.Comment
-
Originally posted by JamJarST View PostYou do know that agents lie don't you?
But I am getting mental and restless being benched and that is a real pain in the neck for me as I have never been out of work for the last 25 years and it is like being a zombie. Work would be a holiday for me at the moment.Last edited by BS1397; 3 October 2012, 09:21.Comment
-
Absolutely if you're on the bench you have nothing to lose. Go for it.
All the advice on turning it down assumes you're in demand.I'm alright JackComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- HMRC warns IT consultants and others of 12 ‘payroll entities’ Today 09:15
- How you think you look on LinkedIn vs what recruiters see Yesterday 09:00
- Reports of umbrella companies’ death are greatly exaggerated Nov 28 10:11
- A new hiring fraud hinges on a limited company, a passport and ‘Ade’ Nov 27 09:21
- Is an unpaid umbrella company required to pay contractors? Nov 26 09:28
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Nov 25 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
Comment