- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Buying out of a long contract
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by cuperman View Post1. Can the agency legitimately stop me from leaving their contract and signing my own contract with the end client?
2. If they can, what would be a reasonable fee for them to charge to buy out of the contract early?
3. Has anyone had any success negotiating a buy out fee?
1. It depends on what is written in your contract, but the answer is possibly yes. It's also important to consider if you signed an opt out and if it was done in a valid way, ie before the introduction or supply to the client. Even if the agency have a valid opt out then the restrictive covenant in your contract may be unenforceable if it is too draconian though you would need legal advice on challenging this as an illegal restraint of trade.
2. The agency regulations don't define what is a "reasonable" fee but they do restrict the restrictive covenants in your contract to 14 weeks from the start or 8 weeks from the end. You could tell them you never signed a valid opt out and offer them 8 weeks worth of their margin (which probably about 7-20% of your fees for 8 weeks work) to release you from the restrictive covenant. I'll tell you something for free though, they will have much bigger balls than you and they will play hard ball on this so you would need the backing of a solicitor specialising in contract law to argue your case.
3. Yes, but here's the kicker. This usually only works when the client are willing to work with the contractor to ditch the agency. Also, the client may or may not have their own restrictive covenant with the agency and although this is limited by law if you didn't sign a valid opt out, the client may or may not be willing to start a fight with the agency about it. Clients generally don't give a tulip about a contractor who doesn't like his agency though they may work with you to oust the agency if you are having trouble getting paid or the agency margin is excessive.
But before you start on this, understand that many clients won't take contractors on direct because there are legal issues around employment rights that they can avoid by using an agency as a middle man. You may negotiate to get rid of your agency only to find that the client won't deal direct with you, however you may be able to get an agency replace your old agency for a fee of 5% or so.
What is your motivation for wanting to cut out the agency? Do you know what percentage of the contract value they are taking?Free advice and opinions - refunds are available if you are not 100% satisfied.Comment
-
Can't believe people get this idea in their head that they can just ditch the agency to save themselves a few quid (or so they think). Forget the idea unless client really wants to do this. Trying to get client to drop the agency and go direct just makes you look like an annoying tit.
In most cases, it might sound like a good idea to you but in 99% of the cases, the client just wont want to do this. Mainly because they cant be arsed and using the agency is just easier and allows them to crack on with minimal hassle.Rhyddid i lofnod psychocandy!!!!Comment
-
Originally posted by kingcook View PostThat's cheap
Mine says £15K buyout (or a 6 month wait, like yours).
Have you ever thought about just paying the agency the £3.5K and going direct with an increase in your rate?
I could have cut out the first agency and gone to the one on the PSL but they would not pay the rateComment
-
Originally posted by psychocandy View PostCan't believe people get this idea in their head that they can just ditch the agency to save themselves a few quid (or so they think). Forget the idea unless client really wants to do this. Trying to get client to drop the agency and go direct just makes you look like an annoying tit.
In most cases, it might sound like a good idea to you but in 99% of the cases, the client just wont want to do this. Mainly because they cant be arsed and using the agency is just easier and allows them to crack on with minimal hassle.Comment
-
Even if you do get on the PSL of your client be prepared for quite a hit on your cash flow, all my end clients have had the agency on 90 to 120 day payment terms!Comment
-
Originally posted by JamJarST View PostEven if you do get on the PSL of your client be prepared for quite a hit on your cash flow, all my end clients have had the agency on 90 to 120 day payment terms!
Its a nice idea and for some it works well but for most it creates more issues and you need to jump through Hoops to get it, unless you can go direct from day one with the right TCsComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Yesterday 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Yesterday 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Yesterday 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
- IR35: Mutuality Of Obligations — updated for 2025/26 Sep 23 05:22
- Only proactive IT contractors can survive recruitment firm closures Sep 22 07:32
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 19 07:16
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 18 21:16
- IR35: Substitution — updated for 2025/26 Sep 18 05:45
Comment