Dear All,
I have been reading through different threads regarding opting-in / opting out, I would like to make some comments. Some of these comments have already been made by others, and some do not agree with those of others.
Since Conduct Regulations 2003 was introduced, there is an Opt-Out form which agencies would prefer you signed. The main points of the regulations are:
1) You are opted-in unless you sign the form to opt-out. Your status remains for the entirety of the contract - this includes extensions i.e. if the contract finishes on Friday, and the extension starts the following Monday, your status cannot be changed.
2) It has nothing to do with IR35 (of course, if you live abroad then this is not a problem anyway).
3) The regulations prevent restrictive clauses being placed upon the contractor. Restrictive clauses include preventing the contractor from going direct or preventing the contractor from switching agency at the end of the contract (whilst still working for the same end client). If such clauses exist in the agency contract and the contractor is opted in, you can report the case to the DTI who will investigate the case and ask the agency to remove the clause. If the agency is to protect its business, it must have provisions in the contract with the end-client to cover this event. Of course, it is not just about the law here - it is important to consider what is fair. For example, if the client genuinely does not want to extend the contract with the agency due to reasons of cost, for example, and then approaches the contractor directly, the contractor could work directly with the end-client. Another example may be that the agency is continually paying late and you wish to move to another agency in order to receive a better service. The fact that an agency is taking a 40% margin is probably not reason enough - this may be something to talk to the agency directly about at the next extension.
4) The regulations restrict the agency's ability to withhold monies from the contractor. For example, if the agency is finding that they are having problems receiving monies from the end-client, that is no reason not to continue paying the contractor in accordance with the terms of the contract.
5) The Conduct Regulations are applicable if the agency is in the UK. It has nothing to do with the nationailty of the contractor.
6) Naturally, an agency cannot give preferential treatment to someone who opts-out. However, it is difficult to prove this and it is therefore something which we need to live with.
7) If the contractor is opted-in, the agency is obliged to collect references, etc - generally, they need to work a bit harder in establishing that you are capable of doing the job in question.
There are other points which I could make but these seem to be the ones which all of you have been discussing in other threads.
Best regards.
(Please note: all of the above is only my opinion, based on my reading of the regulations).
I have been reading through different threads regarding opting-in / opting out, I would like to make some comments. Some of these comments have already been made by others, and some do not agree with those of others.
Since Conduct Regulations 2003 was introduced, there is an Opt-Out form which agencies would prefer you signed. The main points of the regulations are:
1) You are opted-in unless you sign the form to opt-out. Your status remains for the entirety of the contract - this includes extensions i.e. if the contract finishes on Friday, and the extension starts the following Monday, your status cannot be changed.
2) It has nothing to do with IR35 (of course, if you live abroad then this is not a problem anyway).
3) The regulations prevent restrictive clauses being placed upon the contractor. Restrictive clauses include preventing the contractor from going direct or preventing the contractor from switching agency at the end of the contract (whilst still working for the same end client). If such clauses exist in the agency contract and the contractor is opted in, you can report the case to the DTI who will investigate the case and ask the agency to remove the clause. If the agency is to protect its business, it must have provisions in the contract with the end-client to cover this event. Of course, it is not just about the law here - it is important to consider what is fair. For example, if the client genuinely does not want to extend the contract with the agency due to reasons of cost, for example, and then approaches the contractor directly, the contractor could work directly with the end-client. Another example may be that the agency is continually paying late and you wish to move to another agency in order to receive a better service. The fact that an agency is taking a 40% margin is probably not reason enough - this may be something to talk to the agency directly about at the next extension.
4) The regulations restrict the agency's ability to withhold monies from the contractor. For example, if the agency is finding that they are having problems receiving monies from the end-client, that is no reason not to continue paying the contractor in accordance with the terms of the contract.
5) The Conduct Regulations are applicable if the agency is in the UK. It has nothing to do with the nationailty of the contractor.
6) Naturally, an agency cannot give preferential treatment to someone who opts-out. However, it is difficult to prove this and it is therefore something which we need to live with.
7) If the contractor is opted-in, the agency is obliged to collect references, etc - generally, they need to work a bit harder in establishing that you are capable of doing the job in question.
There are other points which I could make but these seem to be the ones which all of you have been discussing in other threads.
Best regards.
(Please note: all of the above is only my opinion, based on my reading of the regulations).
Comment