Originally posted by Taita
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Squeezing the agent's margin/markup at renewal
Collapse
X
-
-
He was looking to raise the price of the service.Originally posted by Taita View PostMaximising profits by targetting the agent rather than just raising the price of your service?Comment
-
Good on you for trying, you win some you lose some. At least you were brave enough to ask because you definitely wouldn't get anything if you didn't try. Let the defeat harden you up for next time.Originally posted by kingcook View PostOK, so i tried to get some of that margin.
But as you say, the net result is that you are BOOMED anyway so
Free advice and opinions - refunds are available if you are not 100% satisfied.Comment
-
Contracting: more of the money, less of the sh1tComment
-
You are trying to make a moral argument which any agent should ignore. The fact is that agents run around and much of what they do yields no earnings whatsover. Your argument is correct in saying that the work the agent has done specific to you is relatively negligible. What you are saying is that the agent should only be rewarded accordingly. If you are saying this then the quid pro quo is that if an agent should only be paid on this basis then you should be paying agents for the running around they do that doesnt yield them any fees - you cant have it both ways (unless the agent is weak of course)Originally posted by Wanderer View PostActually you don't need to prove your value to the project because you aren't asking the client for a rate increase.
The agent needs to prove their value to you as a business. Initially they had value based on the fact that they found the contract and recruited you to do it but since then all they've been doing is factoring the payments and a trivial amount of admin so they aren't worth that fat margin any more so they can give up some of it. Thank you very much.
The agent should not be manipulated by this con trick. Your placement and your fees represent his reward for all the work he does that leads up a blind alley
Your argument is tired and one sided and the agent should ignore it.
Having said that there is no reason whatsoever why you shouldnt negotiate whatever rate you can
Let us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
-
So they bluffed and you caved.Originally posted by kingcook View PostAfter some emailing and phonecalling, agent is adamant that they will not be passing any margin on to me.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Feb 13 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47


Comment