Is there anything illegal about an agency signing a longer contract with contractor than they actually have agreed with client?
For example, client only initially agrees one month with agency and agency sell the contractor a three month contract.
After the first month agency either extends with client (possibly at higher rate which is not passed on) or invokes a termination clause with contractor.
It seems wrong to me, but is it illegal? Seems like it could be misrepresentation?
For example, client only initially agrees one month with agency and agency sell the contractor a three month contract.
After the first month agency either extends with client (possibly at higher rate which is not passed on) or invokes a termination clause with contractor.
It seems wrong to me, but is it illegal? Seems like it could be misrepresentation?
Comment