Hi,
I had a one month contract that is due to be extended for 2 months. However, the agency put as the start date the date of the original one month contract. I have been contracting for years and never come across something like that. They say it has to be like this and it is better for my Ltd company.
At the same time they want to change the notice period from 1 week to 2 months to which I said no and they now want the compromise of 1 month notice period.
My question now is: Why are they doing this with the dates - I was told it is illegal. Could it be that it is not allowed to have a notice period as long as they new contract (which should be for 2 months and should not be backdated).
Also if the new contract/extension is backdated then it is also illegal to change the conditions (i.e. now new notice period also for old dates that already passed) for an already existing/passed contract, no?
Why do you think they are doing this?
I had a one month contract that is due to be extended for 2 months. However, the agency put as the start date the date of the original one month contract. I have been contracting for years and never come across something like that. They say it has to be like this and it is better for my Ltd company.
At the same time they want to change the notice period from 1 week to 2 months to which I said no and they now want the compromise of 1 month notice period.
My question now is: Why are they doing this with the dates - I was told it is illegal. Could it be that it is not allowed to have a notice period as long as they new contract (which should be for 2 months and should not be backdated).
Also if the new contract/extension is backdated then it is also illegal to change the conditions (i.e. now new notice period also for old dates that already passed) for an already existing/passed contract, no?
Why do you think they are doing this?
Comment