Have been contacted by one agent in particular over the last few weeks for 2 separate roles. In both instances these were initially contract roles but when we got to the interview stage the agent came up with "the client would prefer you on a fixed term basis (but working for the agent NOT the client) rather than as a ltd company contractor.
Call me Mr Cynical but my guess is the client knows nothing of this, still pays the agent the going rate and the agent's margin is increased exponentionally i.e charge client £450 a day but instead of paying contractor £400 a day he's get's £60k p.a.
The agent is adamant that the client prefers it this way - but is there really anything in this for the client?? Am I missing something other than the usual greedy agent antics?
Call me Mr Cynical but my guess is the client knows nothing of this, still pays the agent the going rate and the agent's margin is increased exponentionally i.e charge client £450 a day but instead of paying contractor £400 a day he's get's £60k p.a.
The agent is adamant that the client prefers it this way - but is there really anything in this for the client?? Am I missing something other than the usual greedy agent antics?


Comment