Originally posted by DieScum
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Being asked to evaluate performance of perm staff
Collapse
X
-
-
Thanks everyone for your suggestions and ideas.
Originally posted by rootsnall View Post
I think it's one for some off the record blah blah blah, say they both appear competent, defo say nothing negative, then a bit more blah blah blah ! Job done.What rootsnall is suggesting runs with my gut feeling of the best approach to this. However, I'm not (as DieScum has suggested) keen on putting anything in writing - I think it'll have to be a phone conversation to keep things as off the record as possible!Originally posted by DieScum View PostI agree with rootsnall.
Spend 5 minutes typing up a bit of blah, blah, very competent, pleasure to work with, blah, blah.
Mal, I agree 100% with everything you've said in principle - however ClientCo is the kind of place (like many places these days) where they don't really "get" contracting as you and I see it. Their default expectation is that contractors will behave in the same manner as FTEs, and more than a certain degree of resistance against this is generally perceived as the contractor being resistant and stubborn just for the sake of it.Originally posted by malvolio View PostThe only safe way to do this (assuming it has to be done!) is to get an addition to your contract to cover the currently out-of-scope work and ensure it makes clear you are making these comments anonymously, your assessment will stick to objective criteria and any subsequent actions based on them are entirely the responibility of the client.
I'm therefore constantly treading a fine line between retaining my independent status as a contractor and meeting their expectations in terms of conduct and behaviour. Any shenanigans like those you've suggested above would no doubt be interpreted as "blah blah blah... irrelevant defiant mumbo jumbo" and be met with a blank stare.Comment
-
Was asked to do this today. Took 5 mins and frankly I was helping them out by giving them something to put on the form. So I only see an upside to this. It's just a going through the motions and a tick box exercise anway. Nobody will get fired or for that matter promoted based on what I say.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andrew Griffith MP says Tories would reform IR35 Oct 7 00:41
- New umbrella company JSL rules: a 2026 guide for contractors Oct 5 22:50
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07

Comment