• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Classic mickey-taking example

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Classic mickey-taking example

    This week I received an approach via Linkedin (I've had some good leads from it so I think it's worth the effort but I know a lot of people are very sceptical).

    Here's a cut and paste of what I got when I asked for a spec and salary:

    "Hi,

    Thanks for coming back to me. I can't attached a job spec to this Linked In email so have just cut and past my ad copy for the role. The role is scoped at around the £40K mark as a permanent appointment.

    Let me know if this is something that could tempt you or if you know a suitable fit for this position.

    Regards,
    XXXX

    Technical QA Manager

    XX is looking for a Technical QA Manager to manage the technical QA pipeline and ensure that project deliverables are of the highest possible quality, allowing Producers to deliver on time, on budget and to specification with confidence.

    The successful candidate will participate in all phases of the systems life cycle, using common software development processes. They will also interface with clients, application users, project managers, account managers, architects, developers and other technical support personnel where necessary. Digital agency is preferred but not essential.

    Details of role

    • Manage the technical QA pipeline and support the project teams with documented technical QA strategy and plans
    • Translate business and technical requirements into documents that clearly define the technical QA plan and scripts for project teams
    • Document risk analysis of any potential impact to business
    • Work with clients and partners on external technical QA, UAT environments and integrated plans
    • Manage third-party partners
    • Be passionate about QA and help grow the QA offering within the company
    • Manage the deployment schedule to production environment, making sure deployments happen in a timely and effective manner, and acting as gatekeeper on all projects being deployed
    • Participate in all phases of the systems life cycle, using common software development processes
    • Manage scope, budget and timings for technical QA team tasks within a project
    • Interface with clients, application users, project managers, account managers, architects, developers and other technical support personnel
    • Bring the latest and best practice into the team on a daily basis

    Knowledge and skills required

    • Excellent stakeholder management and communication skills
    • Process driven and methodical approach
    • Excellent detailed documentation skills
    • Experience of automated test products
    • Experience in managing multiple reporting lines
    • Experience with working in a creative environment
    • Experience of Linux/Unix and Windows operating systems
    • Experience of non-functional testing (load/security)
    • Experience in creating QA test plans
    • Troubleshooting and problem resolution
    • Experience working with third parties
    • Experience working with database technologies
    • Configuration management and code control, using CVS or similar tools
    * Cross browser, accessibility, load, non-functional or automated testing

    Please apply direct to [email protected] with your CV and a covering letter explaining why you‘d like to work at XX.

    Applicants must be legally entitled to work in the UK and available for interview at short notice."

    I wrote back to express my "shock" at the salary. This is in central London by the way working for a very established firm - not some small start-up.

    #2
    Considering what they want - they are having a laugh mate.

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by strawberrysmoothie View Post
      Considering what they want - they are having a laugh mate.
      that's what I told them

      Comment


        #4
        Oh I don't know - its only testing!

        "Click OK" Does screen change? Yes - Test Passed

        [Lighting blue touch paper and running away]

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by JoJoGabor View Post
          Oh I don't know - its only testing!

          "Click OK" Does screen change? Yes - Test Passed

          [Lighting blue touch paper and running away]
          I won't be biting because I love this attitude - I actively encourage it since it constricts supply of good people within the testing arena with obvious consequences for rates.

          Comment


            #6
            Bring the latest and best practice into the team on a daily basis
            That would get really annoying after a couple of weeks.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by thunderlizard View Post
              That would get really annoying after a couple of weeks.
              It means constantly harass people ...
              +50 Xeno Geek Points
              Come back Toolpusher, scotspine, Voodooflux. Pogle
              As for the rest of you - DILLIGAF

              Purveyor of fine quality smut since 2005

              CUK Olympic University Challenge Champions 2010/2012

              Comment


                #8
                I won't be biting because I love this attitude - I actively encourage it since it constricts supply of good people within the testing arena with obvious consequences for rates.
                Really?

                Testing as a career in this country is disappearing down the gurgler I'm afraid, towards our much cheapness buddies.

                Comment


                  #9
                  40K. If I was a tester Id take it.

                  10 a penny.

                  I am always amazed at why testers think they are worth shed loads.

                  At the end of the day if I want to develop software, get a competitive edge, I hire some BA's, Developers and a PM. Last if I have some dosh, I'd hire a tester.

                  No-one ever thinks. I know I need a project delivering, lets hire the testers first!!!

                  Get to the back of the queue and remember.

                  10 a penny.
                  What happens in General, stays in General.
                  You know what they say about assumptions!

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
                    I am always amazed at why testers think they are worth shed loads.
                    In all my years in IT (20 ish) I have known four good testers. People that could intuitively use a new piece of software and then predict what else would be wrong with that suite or system. People that could say "I know what caused this bug" without seeing the code. People that could identify which programmer wrote a piece of code and, therefore, know how to break it.

                    Three of them were in dedicated testing roles.

                    The other was probably the best Senior Programmer I have ever met, and far, far better than almost every developer I have worked with.

                    All four were definitely worth more than an average to good developer.



                    A poor tester, however, is of negative worth.

                    I believe a tester has to be be better and more experienced than the developer that wrote / designed the code they are testing, otherwise their presence does nothing other than result in WORSE development. The developers need to be a little frightened of the testing process and scared they will be shown up. Otherwise, they will not do any testing themselves and blame bugs on the testers.


                    Good tester: worth a fortune.
                    Bad tester: sack. Now.
                    Last edited by RichardCranium; 24 July 2009, 20:59. Reason: Typo
                    My all-time favourite Dilbert cartoon, this is: BTW, a Dumpster is a brand of skip, I think.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X