• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Taking the Michael - a sign of the times

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by pzz76077 View Post
    It will be interesting indeed now that these roles that formally went to contractors are being offshored 10,000 at a time.
    None of these roles will pay any UK tax at all and the tax deficit will massively outweigh any of the recently introduced half baked schemes such as IR35 etc.

    Will UK Gov do anything to resolve the situation?? No, its too late all of these roles have gone for good and UK Plc are much the poorer in more ways than just lost tax revenue.

    PZZ
    Blame us disguised employees for not paying the amount of tax that HMRC expect to collect. Yes, that is the very phrase that they use.

    It's pretty clear: contract rate last couple of years was £650, this year it's £400, agencies will offer £125. If you won't do it for that, they have someone who will.

    Now look at UK plc from No 11: green shoots strangled by profiteering disguised employees. Sod'em, the rate is £125, if business can't find anyone for that, then there is a shortage and we'll fix it by allowing visas in sufficient numbers to keep the cost to business down and get our economy back on its feet.

    I'm done, I'm not even looking in the UK any more.

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by pzz76077 View Post

      Will UK Gov do anything to resolve the situation?? No, its too late all of these roles have gone for good and UK Plc are much the poorer in more ways than just lost tax revenue.
      It's still illegal, if it can be proven that this is taken place can the company not be prosecuted? It would be interesting to know if the PCG is looking at this, think i might have a look.

      Edit: Just had a look on the forums and the PCG were the ones who brought this to the attention of the BBC, and they are providing evidence of the practice to the UK Borders Agency. Seems to be extremly common from what i've read, hopefully this will be taken seriously, but i'm not holding my breath.
      Last edited by the_duderama; 24 June 2009, 16:23.

      Comment


        #13
        I'm afraid this is just another fine example of how New lie bore have successfully managed to destroy this country. Britain will be left on it's knees when whoever actually manage to win the election.

        I wonder if Gordo' has get out clause for this on his "British Jobs for British Workers", like he did with the other Brownism regarding Oil Refinery workers?
        threenine.co.uk
        Cultivate, Develop & Sustain Innovation

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by expat View Post
          I'm done, I'm not even looking in the UK any more.
          Wise. Take the country for whatever you can get and frak off - I did.

          Originally posted by the_duderama View Post
          It's still illegal, if it can be proven that this is taken place can the company not be prosecuted? It would be interesting to know if the PCG is looking at this, think i might have a look.

          Edit: Just had a look on the forums and the PCG were the ones who brought this to the attention of the BBC, and they are providing evidence of the practice to the UK Borders Agency. Seems to be extremly common from what i've read, hopefully this will be taken seriously, but i'm not holding my breath.
          The PCG are a waste of space. This has been going on for nearly ten years and in all that time they have not achieved anything in their petty attempts to protest.

          I think it is all too late for the UK.
          How did this happen? Who's to blame? Well certainly there are those more responsible than others, and they will be held accountable, but again truth be told, if you're looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror.

          Follow me on Twitter - LinkedIn Profile - The HAB blog - New Blog: Mad Cameron
          Xeno points: +5 - Asperger rating: 36 - Paranoid Schizophrenic rating: 44%

          "We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to high office" - Aesop

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by cykophysh39 View Post
            I'm afraid this is just another fine example of how New lie bore have successfully managed to destroy this country. Britain will be left on it's knees when whoever actually manage to win the election.

            I wonder if Gordo' has get out clause for this on his "British Jobs for British Workers", like he did with the other Brownism regarding Oil Refinery workers?
            I think that when Blair effed off and said to Gordo "You can run the country now", Gordo thought that he had mis-spelled "ruin".

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by expat View Post
              Blame us disguised employees for not paying the amount of tax that HMRC expect to collect. Yes, that is the very phrase that they use.

              It's pretty clear: contract rate last couple of years was £650, this year it's £400, agencies will offer £125. If you won't do it for that, they have someone who will.

              Now look at UK plc from No 11: green shoots strangled by profiteering disguised employees. Sod'em, the rate is £125, if business can't find anyone for that, then there is a shortage and we'll fix it by allowing visas in sufficient numbers to keep the cost to business down and get our economy back on its feet.

              I'm done, I'm not even looking in the UK any more.
              The real issue is that its not just the IT etc that are being offshored, its entire business process that the IT used to support. This is a one way ticket - these deals develop the IT offshore as a small part of the business process, the real savings for UK companies is that not only do they not need to develop IT systems any more, they dont have the issue of directly employed staff any more.

              For IT contractors the situation is terminal - a few years ago, UK co's had no choice but to hire us for skills shortfalls. Now there are thousands of other options in the form of offshoring co's around the world, all of which will take the entire business process of the hands of UK cos in a 5-15 year deal and deliver an acceptable business solution (yes I know the IT will be crap, but they can mitigate this by employing a few hundred extra staff for next to nothing to paste over the cracks- the client doesn't care how service is maintained!).

              I would agree that the UK contracting marked is dead and will never recover to the extent of the gravy train of late 90's/early 2k's.

              This is one of the reasons that I have not worked in the UK since 98. Strangely, the UK offshore or die mentality has not manifested in mainland Europe as yet.
              Agencies have recognized this and it is the main reason why so many UK agents have expanded into Europe in the past few years and there are many more Euro contracts on sites like Jobswerve these days.


              PZZ

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by original PM View Post
                I reckon the agents are trying it on becuase of all the doom and gloom on this website - not had a contract for xxx months etc etc
                Not sure. I think you'd need to be an exceptionally thick-skinned agent, probably with a death-wish, to read this site on a regular basis.

                Agent --><-- Contractor

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by pzz76077 View Post
                  It will be interesting indeed now that these roles that formally went to contractors are being offshored 10,000 at a time.
                  None of these roles will pay any UK tax at all and the tax deficit will massively outweigh any of the recently introduced half baked schemes such as IR35 etc.
                  Maybe those roles won't but it doesn't mean the tax isn't collected.

                  Let's say you charged the company 100k a year for the job. Thats £35,000 in CT the government don't get, replaced by whatever tax you pay. Possibly 20k in corporate and personal taxes if you are efficient. So the overall tax take from you and client is 20k.

                  Along comes the off shorer and their bid is 25k - let's assume that they can actually deliver what you otherwise would have (possibly a big ask).

                  Now in this case client CO has an extra 75k profit on its books. Which it neatly pays about 28k in CT.

                  In this particular scenario tax revenue actually increases. (Though it is extreme). Certainly the extra 8k would pay your benefits....

                  I'm not trying to suggest that there isn't an impact - there is. It's just that's its probably not as big as people generally expect.

                  Comment


                    #19
                    More big co's are registering outside the UK though so will pay no corp tax in the UK. Take Petrofac, a big player in oil and gas services and very successful too. They're a footsie 100 co, but registered in Jersey. I wonder how much corp tax they pay?
                    Public Service Posting by the BBC - Bloggs Bulls**t Corp.
                    Officially CUK certified - Thick as f**k.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by Fred Bloggs View Post
                      More big co's are registering outside the UK though so will pay no corp tax in the UK. Take Petrofac, a big player in oil and gas services and very successful too. They're a footsie 100 co, but registered in Jersey. I wonder how much corp tax they pay?
                      So is HAB Inc.

                      <snip />

                      I did have a longer post but it gave away too much detail.
                      How did this happen? Who's to blame? Well certainly there are those more responsible than others, and they will be held accountable, but again truth be told, if you're looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror.

                      Follow me on Twitter - LinkedIn Profile - The HAB blog - New Blog: Mad Cameron
                      Xeno points: +5 - Asperger rating: 36 - Paranoid Schizophrenic rating: 44%

                      "We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to high office" - Aesop

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X