• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Are lots of short-term contracts a liability?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by KentPhilip View Post
    The solution to that little conumdrum is to remove some of the less illustrious contracts from the middle of your CV, and move the start/end dates out to cover the gaps. Don't change your last contract though. Nobody but the most anal of clients are going to check.

    Oh and any particular skillsets you gained in the contracts you have removed - just move them to an adjacent contract you left in.

    If J K Rowling can make millions from writing fiction, why can't I?
    I am increasingly being asked for 3 years of references, which agencies seem to check up on. I wouldn't be able to get away with this, and wouldn't try.
    Practically perfect in every way....there's a time and (more importantly) a place for malarkey.
    +5 Xeno Cool Points

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by PM-Junkie View Post
      Utter tripe. My company is engaged to do a specific job for a specific time. When that job is done I/we usually move on to find another victim, I mean customer....unless there is another task that needs doing and it is in my company's interests to do it.

      If you think that means people like me are are tulipe, then that says a lot more about you than it does me!
      Same here. If my role lasts longer than 6/9 months, it becomes too BAU, there is simply not the need for it. If I only had a few long contracts on my CV I would be rubbish.
      Practically perfect in every way....there's a time and (more importantly) a place for malarkey.
      +5 Xeno Cool Points

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by KentPhilip View Post
        The solution to that little conumdrum is to remove some of the less illustrious contracts from the middle of your CV, and move the start/end dates out to cover the gaps. Don't change your last contract though. Nobody but the most anal of clients are going to check.

        Oh and any particular skillsets you gained in the contracts you have removed - just move them to an adjacent contract you left in.

        If J K Rowling can make millions from writing fiction, why can't I?
        This is exactly the correct thing to do. The CV is a sales doc and Cons need to show only what makes them good for a particular role.

        In 10 yrs I've had 30+ clients with contracts from 1 day to 1 yr+. sometimes with contracts within contracts. There is no way these can all be listed in a permie type CV format. I remove the bulk and take the best bits and put it all together in a nice mix and only give year of project, not specific start/end dates. I also remove references to old or unwanted skills and embellish the targeted skillset if needed, so that I am not bothered with calls for legacy stuff.

        Comment


          #24
          Seems to me like a lot of people are thinking like individuals - this is business people !

          There is nothing wrong with short contracts (apart perhaps from cluttering up one's CV) - you're there do to a specific job and nothing else. As long as you've got good references from short contracts and the reason why the contract was short is sound and honest then no-one can argue with that.
          Apart from the odd ignorant/snotty agent who doesn't understand what contracting is about.

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by adestor View Post
            Seems to me like a lot of people are thinking like individuals - this is business people !

            There is nothing wrong with short contracts (apart perhaps from cluttering up one's CV) - you're there do to a specific job and nothing else. As long as you've got good references from short contracts and the reason why the contract was short is sound and honest then no-one can argue with that.
            Apart from the odd ignorant/snotty agent who doesn't understand what contracting is about.
            Alot of banks see short contracts (and particularly lack of renewal) as bad.

            But they are hardly recruiting at the moment.

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
              Alot of banks see short contracts (and particularly lack of renewal) as bad.

              But they are hardly recruiting at the moment.
              Hmm, just started with an investment bank consultancy and they didn't view my previous 3 month contract (with no renewal) as a problem.
              As long as you're good at your job and have good references then there is no issue.

              Comment


                #27
                short contracts shouldn't make a difference, ultimately a client
                has a problem and needs someone in fast who knows what he's
                doing who can fix the problem.

                If applying for any roles in finance or govt, don't change the dates or
                employers around, in my experience they outsource the checking to
                risk security company who will verify all dates for last 5years!!

                example
                http://www.vetyourstaff.com/
                http://www.verifile.co.uk/verifile/about/who.shtml

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by adestor View Post
                  Hmm, just started with an investment bank consultancy and they didn't view my previous 3 month contract (with no renewal) as a problem. As long as you're good at your job and have good references then there is no issue.
                  The problem is, it depends. I wasn't shortlisted for the role I'm in now, they didn't like the first batch so I got in on the 2nd run. A few weeks after I was in I asked my boss what had put him off my CV the first time round.

                  He said I'd had a couple of 3 monthers a couple of years ago, and to him this maybe meant I hadn't been renewed because there'd been problems with me. This guy is a contractor himself, but more in the permietractor mode, so to him a contract which doesn't go on for 3 years means there's a problem.

                  It was all a perception thing. To him I was a risk.
                  Cooking doesn't get tougher than this.

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Jesus farking christ, this thread is all about a non-problem.

                    And whoever posted that drivel about short term contracts making a contractor look tulipe,
                    Older and ...well, just older!!

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by TheBigYinJames View Post
                      The problem is, it depends. I wasn't shortlisted for the role I'm in now, they didn't like the first batch so I got in on the 2nd run. A few weeks after I was in I asked my boss what had put him off my CV the first time round.

                      He said I'd had a couple of 3 monthers a couple of years ago, and to him this maybe meant I hadn't been renewed because there'd been problems with me. This guy is a contractor himself, but more in the permietractor mode, so to him a contract which doesn't go on for 3 years means there's a problem.

                      It was all a perception thing. To him I was a risk.
                      I have had exactly the same happen to me too.
                      Public Service Posting by the BBC - Bloggs Bulls**t Corp.
                      Officially CUK certified - Thick as f**k.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X