Originally posted by TheFaQQer
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Debt Recovery
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by thunderlizard View PostThere is some truth in that. But I'd still prefer to do it that way - pay direct and then let the agency sue for its 15% if it wants to - than put it all through the agency and risk its disappearance.Comment
-
Originally posted by mikeyboy View PostUpdate: Polaris Ltd went into insolvency on Friday...Comment
-
That's-
Polaris Consulting Services Ltd.
Is this the Agency you dealt with DS23?
I'm not even going to reply to this new agency. It can only upset the apple cart as far as I'm concerned.Comment
-
Originally posted by mikeyboy View PostComment
-
Originally posted by thunderlizard View PostThere is some truth in that. But I'd still prefer to do it that way - pay direct and then let the agency sue for its 15% if it wants to - than put it all through the agency and risk its disappearance.
IANAA and IANAL, but I'd be wary of going this route without knowing exactly what the potential consequences are for both the client and myself.
Mind you, I'd be claiming on my agency bankruptcy insurance by now, too...Comment
-
Surely though if the agreement was at Polaris' behest with all the legal documents etc to confirm that. The Administrator would not be able to pursue the client?
All the paperwork was signed off last month when Polaris still hoped they wouldn't have to go into Administration.Comment
-
Can anyone else employed via Polaris and reading this thread please drop me a 'PM. Just want to touch base and see what varying stories we've been told.Comment
-
Originally posted by mikeyboy View PostSurely though if the agreement was at Polaris' behest with all the legal documents etc to confirm that. The Administrator would not be able to pursue the client?
All the paperwork was signed off last month when Polaris still hoped they wouldn't have to go into Administration.
Just because the agency think that they are OK with the paperwork, doesn't mean that the receiver / administrator will see it the same way.
I'd ring the PCG legal helpline if you are a member. If not, then some house or car insurance policies come with legal advice lines that you can call. Better to be safe than sorryComment
-
Originally posted by mikeyboy View PostCan anyone else employed via Polaris and reading this thread please drop me a 'PM. Just want to touch base and see what varying stories we've been told.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Yesterday 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
- How debt transfer rules will hit umbrella companies in 2026 Nov 12 09:28
- IT contractor demand floundering despite Autumn Budget 2024 Nov 11 09:30
- An IR35 bill of £19m for National Resources Wales may be just the tip of its iceberg Nov 7 09:20
- Micro-entity accounts: Overview, and how to file with HMRC Nov 6 09:27
Comment