Originally posted by Badger
					
						
						
							
							
							
							
								
								
								
								
									View Post
								
							
						
					
				
				
			
		- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
New Role, No contract signed
				
					Collapse
				
			
		
	X
- 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 Why 28 days? If you are able to "Negotiate" the termination date, it should be 7 days at best. However, it isn't unusual.If your company is the best place to work in, for a mere £500 p/d, you can advertise here.
- 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 Consideration does not have to be paid for the contract to exist, it only has to be offered.Originally posted by TykeMerc View PostSpot on.
 
 UK contract law is quite clear on this with the 3 basic requirements:-
 
 Offer - You obviously received this
 Acceptance - You've been working there so that's a given
 Consideration - You've been paid (or I hope so)
 
 
 It doesn't have to be money (indeed the contractors "consideration" within the contract is not money),
 
 and it doesn't have to be "sufficient" (I.e it doesn't have to be what a reasonable person would expect it to be).
 
 timComment
- 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 No, these aren't two different ways of saying the same thing.Originally posted by TykeMerc View PostIn other words they can hold you to the contract notice period by getting you to pay the fees they can't collect because you broke the contract and caused them pecuniary loss.
 
 
 They are completely different, that is the point.
 
 timComment
- 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 Originally posted by Badger View PostI've just received a contract which states that the 'service provider is obliged to work the full term of the contract period'
 
 Is this frequently used, and should I challenge it to be 28 days or something?
 
 TIA
 It's as frequently used as they think they can get away with it.
 
 Whether you should challenge it depends upon how much it might cost if you want to break such a clause.
 
 timComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andrew Griffith MP says Tories would reform IR35 Oct 7 00:41
- New umbrella company JSL rules: a 2026 guide for contractors Oct 5 22:50
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07


 
				 
				 
				 
				
Comment