• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Huxley - 28 Days to pay

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    I don't know why you're all getting your knickers in a twist. 30 days is standard for a B2B relationship. In fact, the late payment legislation takes 30 days as standard as well so, if the agency does not pay within 30 days of invoice date, debt recovery costs and daily interest apply...

    Older and ...well, just older!!

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by ratewhore View Post
      I don't know why you're all getting your knickers in a twist. 30 days is standard for a B2B relationship. In fact, the late payment legislation takes 30 days as standard as well so, if the agency does not pay within 30 days of invoice date, debt recovery costs and daily interest apply...

      Which is what I said in the first reply to the OP yet the debate rages on

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by ratewhore View Post
        I don't know why you're all getting your knickers in a twist. 30 days is standard for a B2B relationship. In fact, the late payment legislation takes 30 days as standard as well so, if the agency does not pay within 30 days of invoice date, debt recovery costs and daily interest apply...

        It comes down to what you consider agencies get paid for:

        First off is the obvious, introduction of client to contractor.

        Now first thing you need to realise here is that is all they do, introduce one to the other, they not "agents" in the real sense, aka marketing contractors on their books and seeking business opportunities for them.

        They are actually doing the reverse, seeking contracts, any contracts and once they have them they just go "looking" (aka post to jobserve) for contractors to fill them (and most do this even when they have contractors on their books already that could fill the position). The whole term "Agency" is a misrepresentation. More accurate term is "introduction company"

        Now a real agent, one who works for the contractor, can justify margins of 17% but there is no way an "introduction company" can, especially on the entire length of a long term contract. 1% to 3% would be more appropriate (and actually seen these to be the rates in other areas of business that basically do same thing)

        So, over the years how have "agencies" justified this? By providing a factoring service (and actually been told this by agents themselves when trying to argue their rates down).

        Now for a factoring service 15% is perfectly reasonable, add in the "introduction fee" and you are at the 17% that seems to be the industry standard (give or take a point or two)

        So why do I refuse to accept 30 days to pay on a monthly contract? Because we (contractor & client) are paying the "agency" for a service they are not providing.

        But do I fault the agency for trying to do this? No because it their imperative to get maximum revenue for minim cost/effort, but I do find fault with the contractors that accept this, because they and the client are in effect paying for services they are not getting

        And that is not a responsible way to run a business

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by Not So Wise View Post
          It comes down to what you consider agencies get paid for:

          So why do I refuse to accept 30 days to pay on a monthly contract? Because we (contractor & client) are paying the "agency" for a service they are not providing.

          But do I fault the agency for trying to do this? No because it their imperative to get maximum revenue for minim cost/effort, but I do find fault with the contractors that accept this, because they and the client are in effect paying for services they are not getting

          And that is not a responsible way to run a business
          You make some very good points indeed.

          Some people forget if you get a 6 or 12 month contract, then between the agency and the End Company, they are probably raising purchase orders for your services in 3 month chunks at the least. Especially so if it is linked to a specific Project with its own cost centre. The Agency is probably getting your first 3 Months within the first 30 days of the contract, and then raking in the interest by dragging their feet on payment terms and processes.

          I have never accepted payments more than 10-14 days, and for me same week payment has mostly been the norm. I would specifically reject an agency if it had a 30 day turnaround.

          But, at the end of the day it all comes down to how sort after your skills are, to be picky and choosy like this. I take no rubbish from agencies - they get dumped if they piss me off.
          Last edited by rawly; 31 January 2008, 14:52.

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by rawly View Post
            You make some very good points indeed.

            Some people forget if you get a 6 or 12 month contract, then between the agency and the End Company, they are probably raising purchase orders for you services in 3 month chunks at the least. The Agency is probably getting your first 3 Months within the first 30 days of the contract, and then raking in the interest by dragging their feet on payment terms and processes.

            I have never accepted payments more than 10-14 days, and for me same week payment has mostly been the norm. I would specifically reject an agency if it had a 30 day turnaround.

            But, at the end of the day it all comes down to how sort after your skills are, to be picky and choosy like this. I take no carp from agencies, they get dumped if they piss me off.
            All good and well but those payment terms don't generally fly when you are direct i.e. with no agent and in a B2B contract.

            Personally I would be picky over someone that cannot use 'sought' correctly.

            HTH

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by oracleslave View Post
              All good and well but those payment terms don't generally fly when you are direct i.e. with no agent and in a B2B contract.
              Direct is totally different senario as there is no middle man getting paid to provide a "service" (or who should be providing a service). There 30 days is perfectly acceptable, anything under that is a bonus

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by oracleslave View Post
                Nothing unusual in that IMO. Sounds like standard B2B payment terms.
                Originally posted by ratewhore View Post
                I don't know why you're all getting your knickers in a twist. 30 days is standard for a B2B relationship. In fact, the late payment legislation takes 30 days as standard as well so, if the agency does not pay within 30 days of invoice date, debt recovery costs and daily interest apply...

                You are a business, agency is a business, it's standard terms FFS. Why is everybody getting on their high horse?? The arguments everyone is using to say the agency could pay quicker can apply to anybody.

                If you are direct why shouldn't the end client pay you within 3 days? After all the money is just sitting in their account earning interest....

                Do you always pay your untility/credit card bills within 3 days of getting them? Or do you leave them until the end of the month sometime? WHY!!! SO YOU CAN KEEP THE MONEY IN YOUR ACCOUNT??? BASTARDS!!!!

                I see no reason the agency shouldn't do this and take 17%, they may not do a huge amount but they still have business running costs that have to come out of your rate as well and 3% isn't going to pay for tulip.

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by rawly View Post
                  I take no rubbish from agencies - they get dumped if they piss me off.
                  Just out of interest, how does this affect bench time? Do you find agencies receptive or not?
                  Older and ...well, just older!!

                  Comment


                    #39
                    30 days rule

                    They still take 30 days to 'sort' him out

                    Comment


                      #40
                      Originally posted by ratewhore View Post
                      Just out of interest, how does this affect bench time? Do you find agencies receptive or not?
                      Receptive? No.

                      Until I say "ok not taking the contract" (and meaning it) then I get seem everything I want (mainly pay timescales and business/IR35 unfriendly clauses taken out and friendly ones put in,rates are sorted out long before this and don't allow agencies to lower them). Main thing to always remember is once the client says they want you that you have the advantage for the first time because if you don't take the contract the client is going very unhappy with the agency no matter what the excuse

                      And in case wondering, I am in an area where they could probably find someone with similar skills in no time at all (though would struggle a bit to find someone with similar length of experience)

                      Only once in over 10 years have had the agency not give in, Computer People, and that argument was not about pay timescales but about contract clauses that would have turned me into Hectors Bitch (was virtually a temps contract and the "only one the agency will use") and even that worked to my benefit as got another contract 2 days later at about 20% more that lasted 2 years

                      Ever since avoided like the plague agencies that have reached the size where they think they can have everything their way and screw over the contractors every which way
                      Last edited by Not So Wise; 31 January 2008, 15:35.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X