Hi Guys,
After weeks of slightly being led around a bit by a company I had interviewed direct with, they finally came back with an offer today. They have sent a draft template copy of their standard contract for me to check over. The project was initially estimated over three months, now they are saying two months with a strong possibility of an extension for another month.
So situation is this: I've just heard through a friend that someone who worked for them before simply had his contract terminated after 3months or so and they refused to pay up the remaining outstanding monies. He got laywers involved, and letters flew back and forth, and ultimately the lawyer said it would cost more to chase the monies than what they owe. So now I'm a bit weary of their payment terms clause:
4. PAYMENT.
4.1 In consideration for the work outlined in this Agreement, the Company or related clients shall make monthly payments to the Contractor in the amount of , plus VAT if/as appropriate. Both parties may modify at any time the amounts to be paid to the Contractor , but any and all such modifications shall be in writing and shall be signed by both parties in order to be effective.
4.2 Payment shall be made 30days from the date of invoice, or as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter, for the work performed that month. Timesheets of hours worked will be submitted to the Company along with the invoice, having been signed by the prime client for the work done. Work performed for less than a full month shall be prorated accordingly. Payment shall be made by cheque or via bank transfer, or by other means as agreed to by both parties.
My concerns here are both "or as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter" and "Timesheets of hours worked will be submitted to the Company along with the invoice, having been signed by the prime client for the work done." Surely they could just not pay by saying "it's not reasonably practical"? And the "prime client" suggest someone who is not the company themselves but whoever they are working for...
Should I try to get this changed and how would I strengthen it??? Should I just demand a fixed payment schedule on set dates??
Thanks!
After weeks of slightly being led around a bit by a company I had interviewed direct with, they finally came back with an offer today. They have sent a draft template copy of their standard contract for me to check over. The project was initially estimated over three months, now they are saying two months with a strong possibility of an extension for another month.
So situation is this: I've just heard through a friend that someone who worked for them before simply had his contract terminated after 3months or so and they refused to pay up the remaining outstanding monies. He got laywers involved, and letters flew back and forth, and ultimately the lawyer said it would cost more to chase the monies than what they owe. So now I'm a bit weary of their payment terms clause:
4. PAYMENT.
4.1 In consideration for the work outlined in this Agreement, the Company or related clients shall make monthly payments to the Contractor in the amount of , plus VAT if/as appropriate. Both parties may modify at any time the amounts to be paid to the Contractor , but any and all such modifications shall be in writing and shall be signed by both parties in order to be effective.
4.2 Payment shall be made 30days from the date of invoice, or as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter, for the work performed that month. Timesheets of hours worked will be submitted to the Company along with the invoice, having been signed by the prime client for the work done. Work performed for less than a full month shall be prorated accordingly. Payment shall be made by cheque or via bank transfer, or by other means as agreed to by both parties.
My concerns here are both "or as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter" and "Timesheets of hours worked will be submitted to the Company along with the invoice, having been signed by the prime client for the work done." Surely they could just not pay by saying "it's not reasonably practical"? And the "prime client" suggest someone who is not the company themselves but whoever they are working for...
Should I try to get this changed and how would I strengthen it??? Should I just demand a fixed payment schedule on set dates??
Thanks!
Comment