Originally posted by Old Greg
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
first contract....
Collapse
X
-
Not the best one at that either. Employer??'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
-
No. First post after 8 years and 11 months.Originally posted by Old Greg View PostFirst post after 9 years??I'm not fat, I'm just fluffy.Comment
-
That is also imprecise, so I'll stick to mine, thank you.Originally posted by DeludedKitten View PostNo. First post after 8 years and 11 months.Comment
-
Good idea. It's better to be consistently wrong than more accurateOriginally posted by Old Greg View PostThat is also imprecise, so I'll stick to mine, thank you.
8 years, 10 months, 28 days to be preciseI'm not fat, I'm just fluffy.Comment
-
Well that's gonna be wrong tomorrow.Originally posted by DeludedKitten View PostGood idea. It's better to be consistently wrong than more accurate
8 years, 10 months, 28 days to be precise'CUK forum personality of 2011 - Winner - Yes really!!!!
Comment
-
You don't even know if that is correct to the nearest day.Originally posted by DeludedKitten View PostGood idea. It's better to be consistently wrong than more accurate
8 years, 10 months, 28 days to be preciseComment
-
WGAF??? - @admin where's the emojithingybob for that? - it's Really needed in a lot of threads, and good for the environment by saving keystrokesOriginally posted by Old Greg View PostYou don't even know if that is correct to the nearest day.
Comment
-
That's the difference between the day that they joined and the day that they posted.Originally posted by Old Greg View PostYou don't even know if that is correct to the nearest day.
HTHI'm not fat, I'm just fluffy.Comment
-
Originally posted by DeludedKitten View PostGood idea. It's better to be consistently wrong than more accurate
8 years, 10 months, 28 days to be preciseSo how do you know it was precisely 8 years, 10 months and 28 days? Do you know what time of day they joined?Originally posted by DeludedKitten View PostThat's the difference between the day that they joined and the day that they posted.
HTHComment
-
Yup.Originally posted by Old Greg View PostFirst post after 9 years??
I must be off my game, I'll try harder for you. Not an employer, a simple 20+ year contractor that thought putting the guys mind at ease over the duration might be helpful.Originally posted by northernladuk View PostNot the best one at that either. Employer??Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36

Comment