I've just been through an IR35 Working Practices Review with QDos but this has found the practices within IR35 due to supervision because I've answered Yes to:
Does anyone have the right to rigorously scrutinise the contractor's work?
I'm a software developer, working on a project with other developers. For each piece of functionality developed, a Pull Request is made on GitHub, and the code will be reviewed by other members of the project team before being merged.
A code review allows anyone in the project team the right to scrutinize the work, however this is more a collaborative process that the whole team gains from, rather than a supervisory role where one person will reject work until they think its good enough.
Code reviews on software development projects are extremely common, there must be some contractors on here working outside of IR35 that participate in code reviews?
Does anyone have the right to rigorously scrutinise the contractor's work?
I'm a software developer, working on a project with other developers. For each piece of functionality developed, a Pull Request is made on GitHub, and the code will be reviewed by other members of the project team before being merged.
A code review allows anyone in the project team the right to scrutinize the work, however this is more a collaborative process that the whole team gains from, rather than a supervisory role where one person will reject work until they think its good enough.
Code reviews on software development projects are extremely common, there must be some contractors on here working outside of IR35 that participate in code reviews?
Comment