Originally posted by GillsMan
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
sponsor tier2 visa
Collapse
X
-
Thanks for the info. Do you mind me asking if you are a one man band and does that matter a lot while applying. -
Please read this.Originally posted by Andy2 View PostThanks for the info. Do you mind me asking if you are a one man band and does that matter a lot while applying.
Tier 2 genral : UK Tier 2 (Employer Sponsored) visas • Immigrationboards.com
Under T2 rules you can only be employed by the end client direct, you cannot work via an intermediary. Lots of dodgy companies do do it, but they are being jumped on and hit with hefty fines.Comment
-
No, not a one-man band. It doesn't explicitly matter, but I suspect it's a factor, though.Originally posted by Andy2 View PostThanks for the info. Do you mind me asking if you are a one man band and does that matter a lot while applying.
I wonder how that would work in my situation. So I employ 5 people. One of whom is on a Tier 2 visa. If a client asked for a day's consultancy, and I sent my Tier 2 visa employee and charged a daily rate, would that be OK? What about if they wanted that for a week? What about three months?Originally posted by stek View PostPlease read this.
Tier 2 genral : UK Tier 2 (Employer Sponsored) visas • Immigrationboards.com
Under T2 rules you can only be employed by the end client direct, you cannot work via an intermediary. Lots of dodgy companies do do it, but they are being jumped on and hit with hefty fines.
Everything we do is for an end-client, I just wonder where the limit is with regards to her on-site involvement. It's not relevant as we generally do everything from our own offices, but she is doing some work for me which we're billing on a daily rate basis at the moment. Maybe it's OK, because even if I sent her on client site for a month, she's still employed by me, and whether we bill her out at £200 or £500pd, her salary remains the same.
Edit: I found the answer - the sponsor (i.e. MyCo Ltd) must be the company that determines the duties for the migrant worker. So contracting out to client site is legal, but I must be the one who determines her duties. Realistically, that may well work for me, as I have a more established business with processes, etc, but not for the OP - and in any case, the OP would have to payroll his chum.Last edited by GillsMan; 10 March 2016, 10:36.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Should a new limited company not making much money pay a salary/dividend? Yesterday 08:43
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Feb 12 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47

Comment