Originally posted by MrMarkyMark
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Please confirm that you are happy to be represented by XYZ for the role...
Collapse
X
-
-
Ah, once you include the word some, yes indeed.Originally posted by jmo21 View PostThat would come under "some combination of" would it not?
Just off to get may Pedant cap
The Chunt of Chunts.Comment
-
Originally posted by MrMarkyMark View PostAh, once you include the word some, yes indeed.
Just off to get may Pedant cap
Comment
-
I don't think so. If you reply to an e-mail with that then 3 days later an agent rings and you explain you were put forward 3 days ago but gave them 2 days to get back to you or they lost exclusivity, and that agent puts you forward instead, if the original agency kicks off later on you can show them where to stick it. If they kick off without you sending an e-mail they'll just create a big enough tulipstorm that no-one wants to handle it.Originally posted by SueEllen View PostAnd to be fair the 48 hours are meaningless....
Sure they might try to do that anyway but I reckon it gives you some recourse - especially since the 2nd agent would likely say to the client/1st agent that their exclusivity expired and you can forward them the e-mail.
Never trust an agent but at least in this scenario you are pitting agent against agent cos they all want their cut
Unless you're the lead dog, the scenery never changes.
Currently 10+ contracts available in your areaComment
-
Problem with the 48 hours is some clients take over a week to give feedback.Originally posted by NibblyPig View PostI don't think so. If you reply to an e-mail with that then 3 days later an agent rings and you explain you were put forward 3 days ago but gave them 2 days to get back to you or they lost exclusivity, and that agent puts you forward instead, if the original agency kicks off later on you can show them where to stick it. If they kick off without you sending an e-mail they'll just create a big enough tulipstorm that no-one wants to handle it.
Sure they might try to do that anyway but I reckon it gives you some recourse - especially since the 2nd agent would likely say to the client/1st agent that their exclusivity expired and you can forward them the e-mail.
Never trust an agent but at least in this scenario you are pitting agent against agent cos they all want their cut
In other cases the 48 hours means you have lost the contract.
So you need to tell the next agent to check regardless."You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JRComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Six things coming to contractors in 2026: a year of change, caution and (maybe) opportunity Today 06:24
- Umbrella companies, beware JSL tunnel vision now that the Employment Rights Act is law Yesterday 06:11
- 26 predictions for UK IT contracting in 2026 Jan 5 07:17
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48

Comment