Hi all,
I'm new to CUK but have been a long time lurker, mainly finding out what I need from previous posts and threads. However, I'm now in a strange situation with a potential gig which I wonder if any of you could advise me on.
Had an interview earlier this week with a large Consultancy which consisted of discussing my experience, a grilling via their technical guy in the interview and general HR type questioning. Position was for someone to be based at their client's site along with client permies. Turned out the previous contractor got a new gig and left, so I'm his replacement.
Yesterday, I was made an offer via the agency and all seemed well. Now the agency have called me to advise that the client's client (namely a permie on-site) wants to speak with me before a formal offer is to be made, I have to call him at a specific time today. Agent told me "the on-site permie wants to just talk with you first before a formal offer is issued. We'll set up the time for today and give you the number to call". In my head I was thinking "why should I have to make the call?" but I remained professional and polite so agreed to make the call once I had the details. I was then asked to try and hide the fact I'm a contractor who is going to be the prospective new bloke at the consultancy. I sort of agreed but stated that if I'm asked directly then of course I will have to tell the truth. Agent agreed with this approach, or should I say, seemed to agree. To be honest, I have no idea what these people think, so am probably naive to assume he agreed with me just on face value.
I have no issues with going a long with this, but something tells me that the permie wants to conduct his own interview with me. And if he's not satisfied then I don't get the gig. It's only an assumption, but the interview process to get this far was like jumping through hoops. So I didn't really expect this 'next stage' after a verbal offer?
BTW, I'm not interested in suing, legal threats or grabs for money. Nothing is signed, offer was verbal and was meant to be sorted this morning. Now this? I just feel a little uncomfortable with the fact I've been told to call someone who, I think, will actually decide my fate?
Really not sure on this one. First time for me that this has cropped up.
Your thoughts would be very much appreciated.
Thanks
Roger.
P.S. sorry for the bad grammar.
I'm new to CUK but have been a long time lurker, mainly finding out what I need from previous posts and threads. However, I'm now in a strange situation with a potential gig which I wonder if any of you could advise me on.
Had an interview earlier this week with a large Consultancy which consisted of discussing my experience, a grilling via their technical guy in the interview and general HR type questioning. Position was for someone to be based at their client's site along with client permies. Turned out the previous contractor got a new gig and left, so I'm his replacement.
Yesterday, I was made an offer via the agency and all seemed well. Now the agency have called me to advise that the client's client (namely a permie on-site) wants to speak with me before a formal offer is to be made, I have to call him at a specific time today. Agent told me "the on-site permie wants to just talk with you first before a formal offer is issued. We'll set up the time for today and give you the number to call". In my head I was thinking "why should I have to make the call?" but I remained professional and polite so agreed to make the call once I had the details. I was then asked to try and hide the fact I'm a contractor who is going to be the prospective new bloke at the consultancy. I sort of agreed but stated that if I'm asked directly then of course I will have to tell the truth. Agent agreed with this approach, or should I say, seemed to agree. To be honest, I have no idea what these people think, so am probably naive to assume he agreed with me just on face value.
I have no issues with going a long with this, but something tells me that the permie wants to conduct his own interview with me. And if he's not satisfied then I don't get the gig. It's only an assumption, but the interview process to get this far was like jumping through hoops. So I didn't really expect this 'next stage' after a verbal offer?
BTW, I'm not interested in suing, legal threats or grabs for money. Nothing is signed, offer was verbal and was meant to be sorted this morning. Now this? I just feel a little uncomfortable with the fact I've been told to call someone who, I think, will actually decide my fate?
Really not sure on this one. First time for me that this has cropped up.
Your thoughts would be very much appreciated.
Thanks
Roger.
P.S. sorry for the bad grammar.
Comment