Originally posted by Flubster
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Just a moan
Collapse
X
-
-
tulipty stick alert...Originally posted by ClipheadRegressive...
His heart is in the right place - shame we can't say the same about his brain...Comment
-
Amending contracts is a recipe for disaster. If I were you, I'd be adding late payment penalties and interest to my invoices in accordance with the legislation (http://www.payontime.co.uk/).
HTH...
Older and ...well, just older!!Comment
-
Good point! Thanks for the link. They're bound to FU again so I'll be looking closely at this.Originally posted by ratewhoreAmending contracts is a recipe for disaster. If I were you, I'd be adding late payment penalties and interest to my invoices in accordance with the legislation (http://www.payontime.co.uk/).
HTH...

Comment
-
Originally posted by TrollAny delay in payment is fundamental breach of contract = walk away
Oh no it's not. Read "Blackstone's Civil Practice 2006""A people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves and traitors are not victims, but accomplices," George OrwellComment
-
It's not what I consider it to be that's important, it's what the courts consider it that matters.Originally posted by Troll<snigger> tell me then what you would consider a 'major' breach?
They consider late payment as a minor breach. Of course the company still owe you the money. Of course you can claim interest, but you most certainly cannot use one incidence of late payment to void the contract, which is the point I was making.
timComment
-
Tim is right, if you could prove they did not intend to make the payment at all then they are in breach, otherwise they are only in default which at most attracts a small fine, obviously compounded defaults would make a breach.Originally posted by tim123It's not what I consider it to be that's important, it's what the courts consider it that matters.
They consider late payment as a minor breach. Of course the company still owe you the money. Of course you can claim interest, but you most certainly cannot use one incidence of late payment to void the contract, which is the point I was making.
tim
Think of it this way, if you had a mortgage (i.e. providing services in exchange for cash) and the customer did not pay the monthly repayment would you think it okay for the bank to repossess the next day. After all it is a breach of contract!!! No didn't think so, but if the customer continually made no attempt to pay at some point it would be acceptable.Comment
-
If you're working for a certain mega-hated group of agencies, you'll have problems with the payroll department. I've threatened to walk twice and subcontract for £0 through another contractor's Limited (as the exclusivity deal is void then!)
Worked wonders!!
Serving religion with the contempt it deserves...Comment
-
Can't be arsed... could you please summarise, especially the bits about 'consideration'Originally posted by PaddyOh no it's not. Read "Blackstone's Civil Practice 2006"How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't thinkComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Today 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Yesterday 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36
- The Fair Work Agency has got zero hours in its sights. Do you? Jul 16 08:44
- Cookie Policy Jul 15 11:50

Comment