Originally posted by Yorkie62
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Project Lie
Collapse
X
-
-
In theory we do, but if the PM chooses not to use it (as Blair did) what's the point in having it?Originally posted by Old Greg View PostYou didn't answer the question. So again:
Are you saying that the UK does not have a veto over changes to the rebate?His heart is in the right place - shame we can't say the same about his brain...Comment
-
So that's a Yes then. Not just in theory but in practice.Originally posted by Mordac View PostIn theory we do, but if the PM chooses not to use it (as Blair did) what's the point in having it?
So, the 100 million per week is never sent to EU and the UK has a veto over it (accepting that it is a feature of a veto that the party that holds the veto may choose not to wield it).
So in what way does leaving the EU free up this 100 million per week to spend on other priorities?Comment
-
Creative accounting?Originally posted by Old Greg View PostSo that's a Yes then. Not just in theory but in practice.
So, the 100 million per week is never sent to EU and the UK has a veto over it (accepting that it is a feature of a veto that the party that holds the veto may choose not to wield it).
So in what way does leaving the EU free up this 100 million per week to spend on other priorities?His heart is in the right place - shame we can't say the same about his brain...Comment
-
The Times has plenty of pro-remain contributors. You seem to be unaware that like the leave vote, the remain vote had a large proportion of voters from both the conservative and labour camps. It was not really party along political lines.Originally posted by Yorkie62 View PostI think the Op was referring to the Guardian Newspaper being the Official reading material of the remain camp.Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- IT contractor demand climbed in August 2026 to 40-month high Today 04:53
- 5 steps before your client ‘does a Foreign Office’ and puts 90% of contractors inside IR35 Yesterday 01:11
- Luke’s Story: “I knew it was a loan. But they changed the rules.” Sep 23 00:00
- I registered my company with my home address. Whoops. Here's what Companies House shows the world about you Sep 22 13:06
- The Tories’ three IR35 replacement options — but contractors are right to be sceptical Sep 22 03:51
- Conservatives to replace IR35 outright, Griffith vows — advisers who met him reveal what it should contain Sep 21 05:06
- HMRC’s tax calculation errors: why contractors must check their bill now Sep 17 05:14
- HMRC names 12 loan charge-type schemes, one with ‘Tardis’ clause Sep 15 00:12
- Inside IR35 contractors as zero-hours reform victims is why Kate Dearden must meet us Sep 14 06:37
- Simple Assessment letters: How ex-Personal Service Companies are on HMRC’s radar Sep 11 12:16

Comment