The time for Brexit debate is over

[jamesbrown]

Example?

I suspect that for a poly boy like you, what you describe as having a "mathematical bent" is likely simple school arithmetic.

Yes, correct, you show a lack of proficiency with elementary (GCSE-level) problems.

https://www.contractoruk.com/forums/...tml#post582602

https://www.contractoruk.com/forums/...obability.html

ps. Seems your basic literacy is challenged "too"

https://www.contractoruk.com/forums/...ml#post1852183

It's good that you admit your maths is "to" old and rusty. Additionally, you're as thick as mince.

[sasguru]

Yes, correct, you show a lack of proficiency with elementary (GCSE-level) problems.

https://www.contractoruk.com/forums/...tml#post582602

https://www.contractoruk.com/forums/...obability.html

ps. Seems your basic literacy is challenged "too"

https://www.contractoruk.com/forums/...ml#post1852183

It's good that you admit your maths is "to" old and rusty. Additionally, you're as thick as mince.

I notice you haven't contributed any answers, no doubt because you haven't got a clue what we were talking about.
If I'm a BS'er I must be the worlds best to earn a 6-figure sum year after year doing quantitative work.
What you need to understand is that your cookbook stats learned on your sociology degree from the Poly of Wolverhampton will only take you so far.

[shaunbhoy]

I'll assume that is your usual verbal diarrhoea rather than a really, really stupid question.

And as per usual, your assumptions are pitifully wide of the mark.

It has to be said, it is sometimes hard work to piece together your random gibberish to form any sort of coherent pattern. But then one has to be mindful of the fact that you are a complete fantasist, then it all slots into place much more neatly.

[sasguru]

I'll assume that is your usual verbal diarrhoea rather than a really, really stupid question.

And as per usual, your assumptions are pitifully wide of the mark.

Ah my mistake. It was a really, really stupid question then.

[shaunbhoy]

Ah my mistake. It was a really, really stupid question then.

There goes another of your ridiculous assumptions. It really is "fish in a barrel" with you.

[sasguru]

There goes another of your ridiculous assumptions. It really is "fish in a barrel" with you.

It's not an assumption you gormless twunt, you asked me the question.
Your homework is to try and figure out why it's really really stupid.

[jamesbrown]

I notice you haven't contributed any answers, no doubt because you haven't got a clue what we were talking about.
If I'm a BS'er I must be the worlds best to earn a 6-figure sum year after year doing quantitative work.
What you need to understand is that your cookbook stats learned on your sociology degree from the Poly of Wolverhampton will only take you so far.

Read the fecking thread I linked, you dimwit. Plenty of contributions from me.

Sas, I know a BSing tool monkey when I see one. It's right there in your handle FFS. sasguru. You're the sort of numpty that thinks they can do a two week course in machine learning and python and be let loose into the real world to solve real problems. You have no grounding, sas. There are plenty of clients that are just as thick as you and the fact that you cite your earnings as evidence of competence suggests to me that you're aware of that too. Those than know what they're doing come to me - I work with serious clients on serious projects, not clown shoe projects that are looking for someone with a BTEC in "machine learning" and "python". Those that want a tool monkey come to you, and I'm grateful that you're there for them.

( Incidentally, who the feck around here *doesn't* earn a six-figure sum year after year )

[sasguru]

Read the fecking thread I linked, you dimwit. Plenty of contributions from me.

Sas, I know a BSing tool monkey when I see one. It's right there in your handle FFS. sasguru. You're the sort of numpty that thinks they can do a two week course in machine learning and python and be let loose into the real world to solve real problems. You have no grounding, sas. There are plenty of clients that are just as thick as you and the fact that you cite your earnings as evidence of competence suggests to me that you're aware of that too. Those than know what they're doing come to me - I work with serious clients on serious projects, not clown shoe projects that are looking for someone with a BTEC in "machine learning" and "python". Those that want a tool monkey come to you, and I'm grateful that you're there for them.

( Incidentally, who the feck around here *doesn't* earn a six-figure sum year after year )

Indeed plenty of non-relevant contributions, trying to shoehorn the Binomial where it didn't belong.
I did say there's a limit to cookbook stats and you hit it early in that thread

The fact that you think use of a particular tool or tools is indicative of a skill set tells me what an ignorant tool you are.
And to answer your question, most of your fellow Brexiters aren't on 6-figs.
I doubt you are.

But hey enough about me, I'm alright Jack - back to the subject of the thread - your response told me all I need to know about your intelligence.

[Mordac]

If verbal diarrhoea was postively correlated with IQ, you'd be Einstein.
Sadly it's not.



Interesting how many Brexiters now don't want a real Brexit.

Just for the record, I'm not one of them.

[Mordac]

I've halted my British citizen application after the brexit vote. £1200 through the drain, but it will be worth it. I will now keep my EU citizenship with a permanent residency card in the UK

An early Brexit dividend, perhaps?