• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

JLR not keen on No Deal

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    Magical thinking will only get you so far in the harsh reality of international trade.
    I'm not an international tradesperson so DGAF.

    Happy with my work/life balance these days, having chased the contracting cashpot for ten years.
    The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn't exist

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by DaveB View Post
      Only if that R&D can replace 40,000 jobs and £18bn in exports. (just for JRL)
      £18b in exports doesn’t necessarily mean much if they are all being transferred intercompany to NL at trade price and the U.K. exchequer doesn’t see any tax gain on commercial profits.

      A reduction from 40,000 jobs will hurt though, as will the 300,000 other jobs and associated tax revenues from supporting supply chain businesses, including current U.K. component manufacturers. Those businesses will also need to retool or adjust. Not a short-term task, 10 to 20 years.

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by Zigenare View Post
        Well, if it's good enough for Audi...
        Audi have plants all over Europe (and beyond)
        Ingolstadt and Neckarsulm in Germany as well as Hungary, Belgium and Mexico.

        Then they have shared production with other VAG brands in Slovakia, Spain, Russia, Brazil, India and China. (not counting Lamborghini/Ducati, which is owned by Audi)

        The Slovakian plant was Skoda, and currently the Q7 is made there (along with other VAG cars).
        The Spanish plant was Seat, the Q3 is made there
        A1 - Belgium
        A3/TT - Hungary
        Q5 - Mexico (mostly for Americas)
        A3 & Q3 in Brazil (mostly for Americas)

        India & China manufacturing are for local markets, and the plant in Russia is there to get round import duties - the cars are fully built elsewhere, then stripped down, shipped to Russia as partial assemblies, then fully rebuilt in Russia.

        If JRM introduces punitive tariffs on the EU, then you might see an SKD or CKD process introduced in the UK if demand was high enough
        …Maybe we ain’t that young anymore

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by meridian View Post
          Serious question, does this possibly open up the U.K. to be a world leader in sustainability and electric cars?

          Moving all standard production offshore, to concentrate U.K. R&D and engineers (who are still among the best in the world) on new tech?

          Competition from America and Germany to be sure, but competition can be a healthy thing.
          All those engineers come from EU countries and are leaving as we speak

          Besides that, did anyone think how we are going to charge the cars (if you live in an apartment building for example or you park your car at the streetside and there are limited charging points there will be huge fights amongst residents on a daily basis) and how many nuclear powerplants we need for that

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by Eirikur View Post
            how many nuclear powerplants we need for that
            ...that's easy, the government borrows money off the Chinese to get the French to build the plants.
            …Maybe we ain’t that young anymore

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by WTFH View Post
              ...that's easy, the government borrows money off the Chinese to get the French to build the plants.
              Yes at least we have control of our own energy supply,....oh wait

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by meridian View Post
                £18b in exports doesn’t necessarily mean much if they are all being transferred intercompany to NL at trade price and the U.K. exchequer doesn’t see any tax gain on commercial profits.

                A reduction from 40,000 jobs will hurt though, as will the 300,000 other jobs and associated tax revenues from supporting supply chain businesses, including current U.K. component manufacturers. Those businesses will also need to retool or adjust. Not a short-term task, 10 to 20 years.
                And they pay tax of roughly fourpence halfpenny. And so it goes...
                His heart is in the right place - shame we can't say the same about his brain...

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by LondonManc View Post
                  I'm not an international tradesperson so DGAF.

                  Happy with my work/life balance these days, having chased the contracting cashpot for ten years.
                  To what extent have you considered how the broader economy may impinge on your lifestyle?

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
                    To what extent have you considered how the broader economy may impinge on your lifestyle?
                    He thinks crashing the services economy will mean a surplus of contracting roles as large consultancies implode.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by meridian View Post
                      He thinks crashing the services economy will mean a surplus of contracting roles as large consultancies implode.
                      As I said, magical thinking.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X