• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Let's not send £350M to the NHS for 125 weeks

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by AtW View Post
    You can't have a cake and eat it, that's not a possible positive outcome, it's a fantasy.
    You can go whistle with that saboteur attitude.

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by AtW View Post
      You can't have a cake and eat it, that's not a possible positive outcome, it's a fantasy.
      Really? I've often had cake and eaten it.

      In fact, you cannot eat a cake unless you have cake. Having a cake is a prerequisite to eating said cake.

      Of course you don't have to eat all the cake yourself. You can cut it into 28 slices and give them to your friends if you wish.

      Personally, I'd rather have my own cake and eat it. The friends can bring their own cakes.

      Comment


        #13
        Let them eat cake, no downside at all, they should have done this years ago.

        I'm alright Jack

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by tomtomagain View Post
          Really? I've often had cake and eaten it.

          In fact, you cannot eat a cake unless you have cake. Having a cake is a prerequisite to eating said cake.

          Of course you don't have to eat all the cake yourself. You can cut it into 28 slices and give them to your friends if you wish.

          Personally, I'd rather have my own cake and eat it. The friends can bring their own cakes.
          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/You_ca...ake_and_eat_it

          HTH

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by northernladyuk View Post
            Thanks, I never knew that Wikipedia would have an entry on it and hadn't already googled the expression and read the article. 1538 eh? Who'd have thought it was that old.

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by Eirikur
              hmmm can't delete my post
              More's the pity.
              How much do you think we'd have been in for if Italy/Spain/Greece etc needed bailing out (again)?
              £45bn, much as it sickens me to be sending them what basically amounts to a ransom demand, in the long run will seem very cheap indeed.
              His heart is in the right place - shame we can't say the same about his brain...

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by Mordac View Post
                How much do you think we'd have been in for if Italy/Spain/Greece etc needed bailing out (again)?
                Same amount as it is now or after Brexit - UK is on the hook via membership of IMF, where as members of EuroZone would pick up the rest of the tab.

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by AtW View Post
                  Same amount as it is now or after Brexit - UK is on the hook via membership of IMF, where as members of EuroZone would pick up the rest of the tab.
                  So would being in the EU negate what we would have to pay for being in the IMF or would we essentially 'pay' twice?

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by Mordac View Post
                    More's the pity.
                    How much do you think we'd have been in for if Italy/Spain/Greece etc needed bailing out (again)?
                    £45bn, much as it sickens me to be sending them what basically amounts to a ransom demand, in the long run will seem very cheap indeed.
                    Weren't they bailed out by the Eurozone of which the UK is not a part of or could you provide some figures of how much the UK paid out?
                    Brexit is having a wee in the middle of the room at a house party because nobody is talking to you, and then complaining about the smell.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by original PM View Post
                      So would being in the EU negate what we would have to pay for being in the IMF or would we essentially 'pay' twice?
                      Being in EU won't negate responsibilities that come with IMF membership.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X