• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Juncker says ENglish becoming less important

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #41
    Originally posted by meridian View Post
    Yes, of course. We stay in the EEA and common market in return for a contribution to the EU (say, £350m per week?) without any of that contribution coming back to the poorer regions of the UK, continue to accept freedom of movement, and accept EU laws (without now having a say in how they are drafted), all for a transitionary period. Let's say 40 years?
    It's not freedom of movement it is special visa rules for people from EEA countries.

    Goddammit
    "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

    Comment


      #42
      Originally posted by meridian View Post
      Yes, of course. We stay in the EEA and common market in return for a contribution to the EU (say, £350m per week?) without any of that contribution coming back to the poorer regions of the UK, continue to accept freedom of movement, and accept EU laws (without now having a say in how they are drafted), all for a transitionary period. Let's say 40 years?
      No.

      EEA for 5-7 years then FTA

      Or

      Hard brexit WTO

      I'm happy with either.
      http://www.cih.org/news-article/disp...housing_market

      Comment


        #43
        Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View Post
        No.

        EEA for 5-7 years then FTA

        Or

        Hard brexit WTO

        I'm happy with either.
        Out of interest, why would you be happy with either? Does a hard Brexit make sense economically for the UK overall?

        Comment


          #44
          Originally posted by meridian View Post
          Out of interest, why would you be happy with either? Does a hard Brexit make sense economically for the UK overall?
          Transitionary EEA would save a lot of mincing about before a FTA is agreed.

          Hard brexit to WTO would save a lot of mincing about before at FTA is agreed.

          Both put the ball in our side of the court.
          http://www.cih.org/news-article/disp...housing_market

          Comment


            #45
            Originally posted by meridian View Post
            Out of interest, why would you be happy with either? Does a hard Brexit make sense economically for the UK overall?
            He would be happy because he is an ekonomically illiterate monkey...

            Comment


              #46
              Originally posted by meridian View Post
              Out of interest, why would you be happy with either? Does a hard Brexit make sense economically for the UK overall?
              He's scared of people who have a darker skin colour than him or who follow a different religion, and he thinks Brexit will stop them coming. Unfortunately Brexit will bring more more darker skinned immigrants with a different religion to the UK to compete with him.
              "You’re just a bad memory who doesn’t know when to go away" JR

              Comment


                #47
                Originally posted by PurpleGorilla View Post
                Transitionary EEA would save a lot of mincing about before a FTA is agreed.

                Hard brexit to WTO would save a lot of mincing about before at FTA is agreed.

                Both put the ball in our side of the court.
                Simply staying in the EU would save all the mincing about.
                Will work inside IR35. Or for food.

                Comment


                  #48
                  Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
                  Simply staying in the EU would save all the mincing about.
                  So would have not joining in the first place.

                  Comment


                    #49
                    Originally posted by MarillionFan View Post
                    Russian and Mandarin after the 13th May.

                    #Baba Vanga

                    Told you.
                    What happens in General, stays in General.
                    You know what they say about assumptions!

                    Comment


                      #50
                      Originally posted by cojak View Post
                      That was definitely the case when I worked in Switzerland. Germans refused to speak French, the French refused to speak German and no-one was prepared to learn Dutch.
                      Including the Dutch, ironically. When I was at school with a Dutch lad (mid 80's so this is not exactly current) the English teacher managed to prove that the Dutch kid was better educated in English grammar (thanks to the high level of English taught in the Netherlands) than we were.
                      His family didn't even bother speaking Dutch at home.
                      His heart is in the right place - shame we can't say the same about his brain...

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X