[Merged]Brexit stuff (part 2)

[Old Greg]

I would explain but it requires an IQ greater than 6 to understand.

Then you're unlikely to be able to explain.

[GB9]

I always heard plenty of people saying a referendum was only advisory in any case.
Certainly an expensive way to prove it

And to hold a referendum and not uphold the result would also be pretty careless.

[DodgyAgent]

I've just read the judgement, the court makes it clear, that Referendum's in the UK are advisory only, unless clearly stated in the enabling act. By convention MPs are expected to vote their concise on any issue. As I've said before I feel for the good of the nation the MP's should accede to the will of the people and vote to trigger Article 50, but it must be clear that there is absolutely noting 'illegal' if they decide to do otherwise.

So why have a referendum in the first place?

[GB9]

Then you're unlikely to be able to explain.

Well you haven't understood yet so that makes yours lower than 7. So there!

[milanbenes]

you gotta see the funny side

Milan.

[_V_]

So why have a referendum in the first place?

Oh well, at least we're rid of Ham Face and Gidiot. That alone made it worthwhile. Even if milk has gone up 1p and we nearly had riots over Marmite.

[scooterscot]

So why have a referendum in the first place?

Now you're asking the right questions. It's like Scotland in 2014 all over again.

[GB9]

Now you're asking the right questions. It's like Scotland in 2014 all over again.

Because the majority wanted it?

[DodgyAgent]

Now you're asking the right questions. It's like Scotland in 2014 all over again.

why is it like Scotland?

[shaunbhoy]

I would explain but it requires an IQ greater than 6 to understand.

No! I won't have that. Scurrilous accusation. It has already been established that scooter's IQ is 12! Don't you recall the intellectual head-to-head he had with the milk carton? I know he came out second best, but that was one smart carton!!