Originally posted by Bronco Billy
View Post
It gets better......
Since March, I have landed a contract in my home city, 5 miles away from my house. It’s also the first time I haven’t had to stay away from home since 2001. According to the hard and fast definition of a temporary workplace being “somewhere you do not know you are going to be working for a period of 2 years” then I am currently at a temporary workplace and so can now claim expenses (lunches) and mileage. Obviously this wouldn't be much, and I wouldn't dream of trying to claim accommodation for living in my own home either.
I appreciate that this scenario may be rare, but how ridiculous is that ?
Since March, I have landed a contract in my home city, 5 miles away from my house. It’s also the first time I haven’t had to stay away from home since 2001. According to the hard and fast definition of a temporary workplace being “somewhere you do not know you are going to be working for a period of 2 years” then I am currently at a temporary workplace and so can now claim expenses (lunches) and mileage. Obviously this wouldn't be much, and I wouldn't dream of trying to claim accommodation for living in my own home either.
I appreciate that this scenario may be rare, but how ridiculous is that ?
I think the problem her is you want the rule to fit your situation and because it doesn't you don't like it. It is a pretty clear rule, it's been in place long enough. It's hardly unfair or strange.
Comment