Originally posted by kal
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
90% Take home?
Collapse
X
-
-
Tax avoidance is legal, its about minimising your tax exposure within the law (e.g income sharing with your spouse as per the Arctic case), tax evasion is about illegally not paying tax that you are required to do so by law (= you go to prison), simples.Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View PostI wasn't talking about the Arctic case I was talking about your remark concerning 'avoidance'Comment
-
I know the difference. HMR&C, unfortunately, don't. HMRC wins case against tax avoidance scheme on car repairsOriginally posted by kal View PostTax avoidance is legal, its about minimising your tax exposure within the law (e.g income sharing with your spouse as per the Arctic case), tax evasion is about illegally not paying tax that you are required to do so by law (= you go to prison), simples.Comment
-
It was an avoidance scheme that failed. As such its no longer avoidance and becomes evasion.Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View PostI know the difference. HMR&C, unfortunately, don't. HMRC wins case against tax avoidance scheme on car repairs
It was just another example of an artificial entity being created to fix a problem. It doesn't work because courts see through them.merely at clientco for the entertainmentComment
-
Exactly once it's deemed by the courts to be illegal its no longer avoidance and becomes evasion, the precise point I was trying to make with the avoidance/evasion comment...Originally posted by eek View PostIt was an avoidance scheme that failed. As such its no longer avoidance and becomes evasion.
Its just another example of an artificial entity being created to fix a problem. It doesn't work because courts see through them.Comment
-
Re: 90% Take home?
No 'probably' about it, there is case law and thus precedent. Unless things change HMRC can't challenge spouses or civil partnerships with respect to income splitting.Originally posted by northernladuk View PostAs I am sure the EBT guys thought a couple of years ago as well but it is a fair point and probably quite correct.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers


Comment