• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

90% Take home?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by kal View Post
    HMRC lost the Arctic systems case so I think they already know...

    Revenue loses Arctic Systems test case
    I wasn't talking about the Arctic case I was talking about your remark concerning 'avoidance'
    Connect with me on LinkedIn

    Follow us on Twitter.

    ContractorUK Best Forum Advisor 2015

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View Post
      I wasn't talking about the Arctic case I was talking about your remark concerning 'avoidance'
      Tax avoidance is legal, its about minimising your tax exposure within the law (e.g income sharing with your spouse as per the Arctic case), tax evasion is about illegally not paying tax that you are required to do so by law (= you go to prison), simples.

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by kal View Post
        Tax avoidance is legal, its about minimising your tax exposure within the law (e.g income sharing with your spouse as per the Arctic case), tax evasion is about illegally not paying tax that you are required to do so by law (= you go to prison), simples.
        I know the difference. HMR&C, unfortunately, don't. HMRC wins case against tax avoidance scheme on car repairs
        Connect with me on LinkedIn

        Follow us on Twitter.

        ContractorUK Best Forum Advisor 2015

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View Post
          I know the difference. HMR&C, unfortunately, don't. HMRC wins case against tax avoidance scheme on car repairs
          It was an avoidance scheme that failed. As such its no longer avoidance and becomes evasion.

          It was just another example of an artificial entity being created to fix a problem. It doesn't work because courts see through them.
          merely at clientco for the entertainment

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by eek View Post
            It was an avoidance scheme that failed. As such its no longer avoidance and becomes evasion.

            Its just another example of an artificial entity being created to fix a problem. It doesn't work because courts see through them.
            Exactly once it's deemed by the courts to be illegal its no longer avoidance and becomes evasion, the precise point I was trying to make with the avoidance/evasion comment...

            Comment


              #36
              Re: 90% Take home?

              Originally posted by northernladuk View Post
              As I am sure the EBT guys thought a couple of years ago as well but it is a fair point and probably quite correct.
              No 'probably' about it, there is case law and thus precedent. Unless things change HMRC can't challenge spouses or civil partnerships with respect to income splitting.

              Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2

              Comment

              Working...
              X