Can someone comment from their experience if its a normal practice for the client to sign a separate representation letter before the annual accounts/CT return is filed or the engagement letter is deemed to be sufficient for outlining the responsibilities of the company director?
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Client Letter
Collapse
X
-
-
-
Sorry to disagree Sockpuppet, but this is totally normal.
The Engagement letter sets out the terms of business between you, and the Letter of Representation sets out the basis on which the accounts have been prepared.
Having worked in 4 different accounting practices, all of which were Chartered, all of them issued a letter of rep at year end. It's recommended by the Institute. I'd suggest the only time you wouldn't get one is if your accountant isn't regulated.Comment
-
Comment
-
This thread prompted me to check and it seems my accountant is chartered but not regulated - or at least I can't see anything about a regulating body on their web site.
I've never received or signed a separate letter of representation. We do have a letter of engagement (signed by both parties), which includes sections on "Responsibilities of the directors" and "Scope of the accountants work".
He just does the CT600 and annual financial statement for me. I only sign these once I am satisfied with the numbers and he gets paid when I see that they have been filed.
So far never had a complaint. I know anyone can call themselves an accountant but is it possible to be chartered and not regulated and should I be concerned if that is the case?Comment
-
I'm going to disagree in part.Originally posted by Clare@InTouch View PostSorry to disagree Sockpuppet, but this is totally normal.
The Engagement letter sets out the terms of business between you, and the Letter of Representation sets out the basis on which the accounts have been prepared.
Having worked in 4 different accounting practices, all of which were Chartered, all of them issued a letter of rep at year end. It's recommended by the Institute. I'd suggest the only time you wouldn't get one is if your accountant isn't regulated.
IME a Letter of Representation is only used in Statutory Audit cases - I think it would be unusual in non Statutory Audit assignments even where the accounts are prepared by a regulated firm. To clarify for non accountants, Statutory Audit only applies to larger businesses, with a £6m turnover and.or £3m balance sheet - i.e. not the typical CUK reader whose accounts will not be audited.
Some firms may use one for non audit reporting assignments, but I think it would be uncommon; more usual is for the client to sign a declaration on the accounts that the accounts are correct. Sometimes clients may be asked to sign a separate confirmation / authorisation for submission of the CT600 - I suppose its a moot point when that becomes detailed enough to be called a letter of representation.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36

Comment