I expect I need professional advice but...
I have a contract which could last a while, and would probably come under IR35. Let's assume it pays £100k a year. Also assume I only need modest annual income. And a fact is that I am 57, and while I would like to retire early, my normal retirement age is 66. I have modest pensions already from years of working as a permie, which I could, but don't really want, to take early.
I don't want massive HMRC liability at some point in the future just because I have exploited all the loopholes in this contract, but want to maximise my "take". So...
Let's then assume I pay myself a realistic salary (say £25 - £30k), fully under HMRC rules.
What to do with the balance, to minimise tax, but without exploiting soon-to-be-shut loopholes and other risky ventures - I want a sort of "Jimmy Carr moral" approach.
I've been reading about SSAS pensions which appear efficient as you can invest up to £50k a year.
So, putting aside scheme costs and possibility of "investments going down as well as up" why would I not put the full £50k in?
Do I need to state when I intend to start taking my pension at start up? I assume I could make this 60, or 62. Then at that time take 25% of the pot value as a lump sum, then the rest as a pension (quite how that bit works, I'm not sure - I guess you buy an annuity with the pot).
Or I could carry on winging it, and hope HMRC doesn't catch up with me - but I think we will all see a marked increase in successful investigations in the next couple of years.
Or I could pay myself a full salary as though an umbrella, and just save whatever I want from net pay - but this would suffer enormous reductions from tax.
Or I suppose I could leave the money in the company and continue to pay myself when I have no income - but that still leaves the potential liability for this year.
Thoughts please...?
I have a contract which could last a while, and would probably come under IR35. Let's assume it pays £100k a year. Also assume I only need modest annual income. And a fact is that I am 57, and while I would like to retire early, my normal retirement age is 66. I have modest pensions already from years of working as a permie, which I could, but don't really want, to take early.
I don't want massive HMRC liability at some point in the future just because I have exploited all the loopholes in this contract, but want to maximise my "take". So...
Let's then assume I pay myself a realistic salary (say £25 - £30k), fully under HMRC rules.
What to do with the balance, to minimise tax, but without exploiting soon-to-be-shut loopholes and other risky ventures - I want a sort of "Jimmy Carr moral" approach.
I've been reading about SSAS pensions which appear efficient as you can invest up to £50k a year.
So, putting aside scheme costs and possibility of "investments going down as well as up" why would I not put the full £50k in?
Do I need to state when I intend to start taking my pension at start up? I assume I could make this 60, or 62. Then at that time take 25% of the pot value as a lump sum, then the rest as a pension (quite how that bit works, I'm not sure - I guess you buy an annuity with the pot).
Or I could carry on winging it, and hope HMRC doesn't catch up with me - but I think we will all see a marked increase in successful investigations in the next couple of years.
Or I could pay myself a full salary as though an umbrella, and just save whatever I want from net pay - but this would suffer enormous reductions from tax.
Or I suppose I could leave the money in the company and continue to pay myself when I have no income - but that still leaves the potential liability for this year.
Thoughts please...?


Comment