Don't know if you guys have seen this - court has supported use of retrospective tax legislation - the scheme in question involved avoidance of stamp duty but thought it may be relevant http://www.out-law.com/en/articles/2...ew-says-court/
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
No To Retro Tax – Campaign Against Section 58 Finance Act 2008
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
Topic is closed
-
-
Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View PostDon't know if you guys have seen this - court has supported use of retrospective tax legislation - the scheme in question involved avoidance of stamp duty but thought it may be relevant Retrospective tax legislation blocking an SDLT loophole cannot be challenged by judicial review, says Court
Contrast that with the retro tax applied to us, going back 10 years and with no advance warning.'Orwell's 1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual'. -
Nick Pickles, director of Big Brother Watch.Comment
-
Originally posted by SantaClaus View PostAm I right in thinking it was only retrospective for a year and the chancellor had given advance notice of the retrospective change, so it wasn't really retrospective.
Contrast that with the retro tax applied to us, going back 10 years and with no advance warning.
Tax expert John Christian of Pinsent Masons, the law firm behind Out-Law.com, said that the court's conclusions were "not surprising, given in particular the Chancellor's warning in the 2012 Budget to close down residential SDLT avoidance with retrospective effect".Comment
-
FYI...
Finance Bill Committee scheduled for 2pm
Player
Might have a sweepstake on the number of lies Gauke can spew in an afternoon.'Orwell's 1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual'. -
Nick Pickles, director of Big Brother Watch.Comment
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by smalldog View Postis our clause being debated today? IF not do you know when it is?'Orwell's 1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual'. -
Nick Pickles, director of Big Brother Watch.Comment
-
Originally posted by SantaClaus View PostI think today or tomorrow is the last day of debates. Maybe someone can correct/confirm for me.
Finance Bill 2013-14 to 2014-15 — UK ParliamentSTRENGTH - "A river cuts through rock not because of its power, but its persistence"Comment
-
Comment
-
Originally posted by Safe View PostHave you seen this. They are talking about Retro. read the comments as well!!
www.dotas-scandal.orgComment
-
Keep the tweeting going folks, it's not going unnoticed by the Finance Bill Committee.'Orwell's 1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual'. -
Nick Pickles, director of Big Brother Watch.Comment
Topic is closed
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Yesterday 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
- Why limited company working could be back in vogue in 2025 Dec 16 09:45
Comment