Originally posted by Ninja
View Post
If s58 puts the matter beyond doubt, then they're implicitly admitting that they previously held the matter to be IN doubt (and therefore the responsibility of a Court to decide).
In fact, they're tacitly confirming that it was in SO MUCH doubt that they decided to retrospectively change the Law.
Am I being unnecessarily alarmist, or should Orwell be spinning in his grave? Because this is a perfect example of 'doublethink'!
(btw - many congratulations to smalldog & family!)
Comment