- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
No To Retro Tax – Campaign Against Section 58 Finance Act 2008
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
Topic is closed
-
-
Originally posted by TAF4 View PostWhich may be because Labour and Lib Dems see an opportunity to rock the Tory boat. More significantly the Tories now see the potential 'windfall' tax take evaporating before their eyes leaving them with the challenge of replacing the notional loss. Thieving B'Stards.
- SL -Comment
-
NOTORETROTAX Member login
Hi
Anyone tell me how long until the login details are sent? I registered at 1'ish but not received anything. I have checked junk mail but nothing there either.
ThanksComment
-
Follow up letter sent to MP
following the MP sending response from HMT. My follow up contests every point raised, includes a reference to the new website and the latest news / press release. I refuted all HMT points using info from the documents on site.
Many thanks guysComment
-
Let keep up the momentum
Great Work DR And All,
Joined the fight and first payment made.
Good luck everyone.Comment
-
Originally posted by ContractIn View PostHi
Anyone tell me how long until the login details are sent? I registered at 1'ish but not received anything. I have checked junk mail but nothing there either.
ThanksComment
-
Joined, cajoled and received letters
Top job !
Joined and sent - can you show the current raised amount (in the members area) to see how near the 'target' the total is?
I've cajoled a few others similarly affected to join too.
And received another 2 letters from MP.
1st seems a std DG response to my MPs letter to George Osborne. It states the legal process is at an end.
It also mentions that the courts foundthe retrospective element of s58 is proportionate and compatible with ECHRthroughout HMRC made it clear that it considered the scheme did not work
Just one more more thing DR, can you make the browser favicon for the site the justice/scales one in the docs not the union jack... gives a better representationLast edited by harmony; 23 April 2012, 15:23.Comment
-
Originally posted by silver_lining View PostIts simpler than that... just in opposition now, as such complete u-turn...bunch of duplicitous fockers the lot of them.
ie I dont think its so much about the money here - its about the principle of change. One person - be he gauke, or any of our MPs wont be willing to seriously consider this matter until such time as enough of them actually do - momentum and traction is needed; as well as excellent co-ordination - thats where Whitehouse Consulting come in to the equation.
As we have seen, MPs who have seen the evidence are rather concerned by it - because it indicates that they are not in fact "in charge" of UK financial matters; HMRC are in charge. What HMRC seem to have done makes a complete mockery of parliament - and that point alone - forgetting about the moral rights and wrongs of legitimate tax avoidance - must be enough to make MPs to stand up and take notice of what's happening here on a day to day basis.Last edited by Dieselpower; 23 April 2012, 15:31.Join the campaign at
http://notoretrotax.org.ukComment
-
Very Valid point DP
Originally posted by Dieselpower View PostYes but this year net tax receipts for UK plc will be c £600bn. The amount "not gained" because of our legitimate tax scheme is £200m. ie 1/3000th of their tax income. If you earned 100k a year, would you really be that bothered about getting an extra 33 quid?
ie I dont think its so much about the money here - its about the principle of change. One person - be he gauke, or any of our MPs wont be willing to seriously consider this matter until such time as enough of them actually do - momentum and traction is needed; as well as excellent co-ordination - thats where Whitehouse Consulting come in to the equation.
As we have seen, MPs who have seen the evidence are rather concerned by it - because it indicates that they are not in fact "in charge" of UK financial matters; HMRC are in charge. What HMRC seem to have done makes a complete mockery of parliament - and that point alone - forgetting about the moral rights and wrongs of legitimate tax avoidance - must be enough to make MPs to stand up and take notice of what's happening here on a day to day basis.Comment
-
Originally posted by ContractIn View PostHi
Anyone tell me how long until the login details are sent? I registered at 1'ish but not received anything. I have checked junk mail but nothing there either.
Thanks'Orwell's 1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual'. -
Nick Pickles, director of Big Brother Watch.Comment
Topic is closed
Partners
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Today 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Yesterday 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
- Why limited company working could be back in vogue in 2025 Dec 16 09:45
- Expert Accounting for Contractors: Trusted by thousands Dec 12 14:47
- Finish the song lyric Dec 12 12:05
- A quick read of the taxman’s Spotlight 67 may not be enough Dec 12 09:27
- Contractor MVL Solution from SFP Dec 11 12:53
- Gary Lineker and HMRC broker IR35 settlement on the hush Dec 11 09:10
- IT contractor jobs market sinks to four-year low in November Dec 10 09:30
Comment