• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Withdrawing more money without unacceptable tax bill - Imaginative advice needed

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by ladymuck
    You could make your dog (or other pet) an equal partner in the business, and pay them dividends, which would go into the joint account you have with them? Probably get caught under S660 or whatever it is!!
    The catch with that is the joint account bit and that gets you nailed by S600, if I understand it right anyway. Don't pay divi's in such a way that the money can be construed as coming back to you in anyway and you *should* be ok.
    "Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by boredsenseless
      "I pay myself a minimum wage as required by law,....."
      Minor point. Minimum wage is not generally required for a director unless they have a contract of employment.

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by DaveB
        The catch with that is the joint account bit and that gets you nailed by S600, if I understand it right anyway. Don't pay divi's in such a way that the money can be construed as coming back to you in anyway and you *should* be ok.
        True. How about setting up a new bank account just for the dog and, because he's not got opposable thumbs to hold the cash, you go to the ATM to draw the money out for him?

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by DaveB
          The catch with that is the joint account bit and that gets you nailed by S600, if I understand it right anyway. Don't pay divi's in such a way that the money can be construed as coming back to you in anyway and you *should* be ok.
          If you don't marry the dog you should be OK. The usual bit to attack with S660 only applies to when married.

          Could be a few other flaws with the dog owning half the company though.

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by ASB
            If you don't marry the dog you should be OK. The usual bit to attack with S660 only applies to when married.

            Could be a few other flaws with the dog owning half the company though.

            Thats generally because married couples have joint accounts and the IR can argue that the money is coming back to the majority share holder who should then be paying tax on it at the higher rate. The key is maintaining seperation.

            Yes, in theory the dog with his own account might work, providing you have power of attorney for the dog to manage its financial affairs. However, the minute any of that money ends up in your personal possession you're buggered.
            "Being nice costs nothing and sometimes gets you extra bacon" - Pondlife.

            Comment


              #16
              Originally posted by DaveB
              Thats generally because married couples have joint accounts and the IR can argue that the money is coming back to the majority share holder who should then be paying tax on it at the higher rate.
              Marriage is specific in the legislation. It causes different treatment. But, yes, if there is flowback from a person to which you are not married then hector can easily come a calling. Can't be bothered to go read it again to ascertain the different treatment for married couples.

              I had assumed the dog was going to spend the dosh to it's own benefit on Bonios and French Poodles though.

              Anyway, it's a bit academic since the dog cannot itself own the shares. They would have to be in a blind trust for it, only <i>people</i> over 18 can directly hold shares.

              Comment


                #17
                hmmm

                What if you are married to a dog?


                Anyway getting back on track. If you pay divi's to yourself and your wife (equally) and you both have your own bank account. Then your wife puts some of her divi's in the joint account. The hubby then takes it out of the joint account to help pay the mortgage as his account is the account all the big bills come out of. Is that acceptable? (ignoring the Artic case). Or would the mortage be better coming out of the joint account?

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by jason986
                  What if you are married to a dog?


                  Anyway getting back on track. If you pay divi's to yourself and your wife (equally) and you both have your own bank account. Then your wife puts some of her divi's in the joint account. The hubby then takes it out of the joint account to help pay the mortgage as his account is the account all the big bills come out of. Is that acceptable? (ignoring the Artic case). Or would the mortage be better coming out of the joint account?
                  Read the rule and make your own decision. Our tax system is so transparent that whilst self asessment is mandatory it takes 3 senior appeal court judges and then an appeal to the HOL to decide a simple question.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X