Bribery Act 2010 training - IR35 implications?

[northernladuk]

...but, then you follow a hyperlink to a "my training" portal on their employee intranet site. This also tells you what your employee ID is and who your line manager is

So what??? I wish people would understand IR35 and not jump to the conclusion just because they exist on a system or are asked to take some mandatory training they suddenly become inside.

You also have an entry on their Active Directory and email system like the permies. Are you going to demand you get removed?????

There are many flags and it is about whether you are treated as a permie, existing on a system isn't necessarily one of them. If you have to exist on their training database as it is the system they use to record the fact you have taken this training then so be it. It means **** all else. Everyone contractor from global outsources to your 1 man band will exist on the same system. Just think about it a little without jumping to incorrect conclusions.

[TheFaQQer]

You also have an entry on their Active Directory and email system like the permies. Are you going to demand you get removed?????

Normally, yes. But that's just so that no-one can contact me

[Old Greg]

Is it an external training provider? If so can't you just offer to pay for the training or even do the same course off site with the same provider?

Or bung them £100 to give you a certificate saying you attended.

[PTP]

Glad I saw thread. I nearly started one worried about IR35 implications of being told to take "Mandatory Training" which I guess will be DPA, AML, H&S, Bribery. I'm not so afraid to take it anymore and will do it in non-billed time in case that makes any difference.

Thanks for the useful posts