deleted
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Contract terminated with immediate efect - no written notice? What are my rights?
Collapse
X
-
Contract terminated with immediate efect - no written notice? What are my rights?
Last edited by sijjery; 10 May 2009, 20:52. -
Remember, your contract is with the agency so it is they that do the terminating, not the client. If your contract says as you say it does, that written confirmation of termination must be provided, then insist on that by noon tomorrow. On receipt, issue them with an invoice for the week you did plus one week's notice as per your contract. -
-
Stay in contact with
the manager. In the end he will decide if/when you re-start. It sounds like and agency/client screw up. If he wants you back he'll get you back. Give the manager another call later today.Comment
-
Agency screw up
This is almost certainly a screw up/miscomunication by the agency. Phone the client manager and check he/she still needs you and then ask him/her to confirm with the senior IBM proj mgr that you are still going to be resourced.
The only other example I can think of is that IBM have sourced it internally and aren't telling you!
HTHComment
-
My guess is that the contract with you was never back to back with the
EB to client contract.
The client probably agreed in their contract with the EB that no notice was required, but the EB's contract with you stated that they had agreed a 1 week notice period. No EB is going to pocket a week's money with no client remittance to cover it.
This happens a lot more than people think. Unfortunately, it's not illegal for contracts not to be back to back as each contract is based on its own individual merits in law. However the EB has to be prepared to take the risk that they may have to shell out but most are unlikely to try and force their client's hand by getting them to agree to a 1 week notice period if they don't normally grant it to their other supplier EBs. If the EB is well in with the line manager they probably cooked up an excuse to get both out of a hole becasue the client is unlikely to want to admit to their contract arrangments with the EB and probably doesn't want to lose their supplier EB either if they've serviced them well in the past.
Therefore, as per usual, it's the contractor that pays the price.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36

Comment