• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

BN66 - Court of Appeal and beyond

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    George?

    Originally posted by Ooops View Post
    As a eye opener is there any downside to sending a general letter to all 650 mp's? Or is it better to keep this personal?
    With a call-sign called Ooops, you're not.... George Osborne are you? Only kidding, welcome to the parallel universe!

    At this point, probably not since you know how you feel when you keep getting the same 'bolierplate' response from Government. Anyways we're people and we're all different. My wife keeps telling me I'm 'different' but usually in a brain wiring way.

    I'd be suprised by now if most MP's are not aware of this but we need to ensure they understand what is being asked for any why. I'm sure David Gauke wished he had gone down the Climate Change route in politics. When George Newborne arrives back in the UK, I wonder if he'll be after him with a mouthful of Tourettes!

    Comment


      Originally posted by swede View Post
      Any idea how many of us have one of these as our local MP? Guessing there might not be too many in Caithness or Dundee, but you never know.
      I will be sending Michael Fallon a letter this weekend.

      Comment


        Happy Easter

        The fight is far from done people. There's a mood swing and some momentum. People beyond our parallel universe are hearing more and more about this. Sure, we've not seen Call me Dave running down Parliament St hurling abuse at the Treasury, but you never know...

        Anways, thanks to our friends in the Indian Government, we're off out for a curry tonight to celebrate.

        Comment


          Originally posted by Emigre View Post
          Well, as it happens my partners' parents live in Caithness, and I will be visiting this weekend. I think we can put a tick in that box...
          oh top drawer.

          Comment


            Originally posted by stuffed View Post
            George Osborne has the temerity to argue in favour of Vodafone’s tax abuse in India – and loses » Tax Research UK

            I can see the conversation now:

            Osborne - Gauke -> wtf was that all about. How did this happen

            Gauke - I voted against it, never wanted the legislation. Felt it was always unjust and wrong.

            Osborne - so wtf dont you do something about it now - ya tulip
            Hmmmm. Looks like Osborne's defence was that Vodafone
            had won in court, whereas as we haven't. What he's missed
            is that Vodafone won BEFORE the retrospective law, a chance that we have been denied.

            Comment


              Update from Montpelier

              A letter has gone out but it still doesn't provide much detail on future strategy.

              However, it does confirm that they are now working with Steed and PwC.

              I also know they are talking to deGraaf and KPMG.

              Comment


                Good News

                Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View Post
                A letter has gone out but it still doesn't provide much detail on future strategy.

                However, it does confirm that they are now working with Steed and PwC.

                I also know they are talking to deGraaf and KPMG.
                I would rather that the details are not publicised, as Moira said loose lips sinks ships.............

                Comment


                  Originally posted by stuffed View Post
                  George Osborne has the temerity to argue in favour of Vodafone’s tax abuse in India – and loses » Tax Research UK

                  I can see the conversation now:

                  Osborne - Gauke -> wtf was that all about. How did this happen

                  Gauke - I voted against it, never wanted the legislation. Felt it was always unjust and wrong.

                  Osborne - so wtf dont you do something about it now - ya tulip
                  Love the phrase “clarificatory retrospective amendment". Fits in very well with HMRC double-speak.
                  'Orwell's 1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual'. -
                  Nick Pickles, director of Big Brother Watch.

                  Comment


                    Ashamed....

                    ...that I have done so little so far.

                    Having foolishly believed (hence the moniker) that our plight would result in a successful conclusion in the SC, and that justice would prevail, I now feel resolved, after several depressing weeks, to a more personal involvement in the fight to see that the truth is outed.

                    I have spent the last 4 days reading every single post of this thread and will spend the weekend formulating all the info I have gathered into a sound argument to present to my MP at the earliest opportunity. (Jeremy Hunt)

                    I apologise for lurking only up until now but want to sincerely thank all of you and DR especially for rousing me from my slumber and instilling a very strong desire in me to fight this all the way to the end.

                    FB

                    Comment


                      So HMRC expects to raise £300m from us by way of the windfall that is S58, and so far the cost to UK plc is er £2.2bn. Add to that all the businesses around the world who are now aware of the retrospective impact of S58, thanks to the Indian Govt, and will no longer countenance doing business here...well, just think of a number, a very big number.

                      Nice piece of legislation. Perhaps clarifying that Parliament didn't intend it to be retrospective would be a good place to start.
                      Last edited by Emigre; 5 April 2012, 16:54. Reason: clarification
                      Join the No To Retro Tax Campaign Now
                      "Tax evasion is easy: it involves breaking the law. By tax avoidance OECD means unacceptable avoidance ... This can be contrasted with acceptable tax planning. What is critical is transparency" - Donald Johnston, Secretary-General, OECD

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X