• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Paying Ltd Company Dividend to Invest in a Personal ISA

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by MrRobin View Post
    That's the flaw in your argument... unless you plan to give up work then in what circumstances will you have no further tax to pay? You will have to pay the 25% div tax at some point...
    If you keep it in your business account until retirement then keep your income below the £43k odd threshold each year, there will be no more tax to pay right?

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by Nixon Williams View Post
      An option could be Venture Capital Trusts (VCT's)? - these are certainly higher risk that a standard 'stocks & shares' ISA but there is upfront tax relief available.

      Say you declare a dividend for £10,000 of which you invest £8,333 in a VCT.

      The higher rate tax would be 25%, ie £2,500 but you would receive 30% tax relief on the investment of £2,500 so there would be no change on your overall tax bill.

      You would also have £1,667 to spend as you wished!

      Assuming all goes well with the VCT company, in five years’ time you will get your £8,333 back, free of tax – any gains made from the growth of the VCT, as well as any dividends paid out, are free of tax.

      VCT's should really only be considered by the more sophisticated investor as the risks are certainly higher and should only form part of an overall investment portfolio.

      Alan
      +1

      You could also consider EIS investments which have similar tax breaks, but only need to be held for 3 years.

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by JoJoGabor View Post
        If you keep it in your business account until retirement then keep your income below the £43k odd threshold each year, there will be no more tax to pay right?
        Yes if that's your strategy then that is certainly the most efficient, but it's a long old game and remember that tax laws can change over time so be mindful
        It's about time I changed this sig...

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by MrRobin View Post
          Yes if that's your strategy then that is certainly the most efficient, but it's a long old game and remember that tax laws can change over time so be mindful
          I agree with that, politicians of all colours are looking at increasing taxes, so be careful, who would have predicted a 50% tax rate 5 years ago?
          "The budget should be balanced, the Treasury should be refilled, public debt should be reduced, the arrogance of officialdom should be tempered and controlled, and the assistance to foreign lands should be curtailed lest Rome become bankrupt. People must again learn to work, instead of living on public assistance." Cicero

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by JoJoGabor View Post
            If you keep it in your business account until retirement then keep your income below the £43k odd threshold each year, there will be no more tax to pay right?

            This is exactly the point I was trying to make and so asking the approach other have;

            i.e. do you commonly remain under the 43k and continually retain the excess in the business.

            I cant see that im going to do this as ive higher spending expectations, holidays, property, cars etc. Im not saying spend it all but am I the only one taking dividents of say £50k some years?

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by Joxer View Post
              Given that an ISA is tax-free and compounds each year then surely the effective rate of return over a number of years is greater than the (annual) rates quotes (currently approx 2.8%)?

              Has anyone done the sums and determined whether it's worth getting the funds out of a business bank account (and hence taking the hit on CT)?
              Dunno. So I take out £X and put it in an ISA at 3%. For this I have to pay X/4 in personal tax?
              After N years, you have X*(1.03^N). When X*(1.03^N) = 5X/4 your interest gained equals the original tax paid. Which I think gives solving 1.03^N = 1.25, which has a solution at N = 7.5 years.

              That was fun, wonder if it's accurate
              Originally posted by MaryPoppins
              I'd still not breastfeed a nazi
              Originally posted by vetran
              Urine is quite nourishing

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by Barley View Post
                This is exactly the point I was trying to make and so asking the approach other have;

                i.e. do you commonly remain under the 43k and continually retain the excess in the business.

                I cant see that im going to do this as ive higher spending expectations, holidays, property, cars etc. Im not saying spend it all but am I the only one taking dividents of say £50k some years?
                Nope, I take the lot and spend spend spend!!! Now where's that Ivory back scratcher?

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by d000hg View Post
                  Dunno. So I take out £X and put it in an ISA at 3%. For this I have to pay X/4 in personal tax?
                  After N years, you have X*(1.03^N). When X*(1.03^N) = 5X/4 your interest gained equals the original tax paid. Which I think gives solving 1.03^N = 1.25, which has a solution at N = 7.5 years.

                  That was fun, wonder if it's accurate
                  I think it should be 4X/3, so N = 9.7, when rate = 3%
                  It's about time I changed this sig...

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Originally posted by MrRobin View Post
                    I think it should be 4X/3, so N = 9.7, when rate = 3%
                    Correct, it is log (4/3) / log 1.03 = 9.73 years.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X