Originally posted by sal626
View Post
Full judgment here:
http://www.financeandtaxtribunals.go...51/TC02372.pdf
and it contains the following quotes:
"The extent of the employer’s obligation is to make a
payment into trust. The trust structure and loans bear to be of legal effect. Loans
were discretionary although in fact they were (almost) invariably granted. But that
was the extent of the employee’s benefit. Whether the arrangement is viewed
commercially or legalistically, the inexorable conclusion, in our view, is that the
payments into trust became a loan and no more. They were not paid over absolutely
and so do not become earnings or emoluments.”
Yet more weight of evidence in the use of EBTs, even in a case such as this which does not appear to be a very well run scheme.
Comment