• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

BN66 - Round 2 (Court of Appeal)

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by silver_lining View Post
    Johnnycomelately - ignore any advice from AJ, he is not best placed to give advice or trustworthy.
    Shame really, if he had joined our cause and fought against HMRC he might have had a better outcome. Instead he sided with the Devil at the hearing and according to his own quotes he is still staring bankruptcy in the face....so what advantage did that give, you picked the wrong side Alan..
    Last edited by smalldog; 22 October 2010, 11:25.

    Comment


      AJ

      Can I suggest no-one responds or rises to the bait with the hearing just over a week away.

      I know it's difficult to ignore but, trust me, it ain't worth it.

      Thanks
      DR

      Comment


        Prof Negligence

        Originally posted by seadog View Post
        DR

        It does not matter whether it was or was not legal. Its about revealing all the information you know to your clients.
        Like Helen7 I was never told by either MontP or my own professional accountants who introduced and recommended the scheme to me.
        If one or both of them had advised me that 500 pepole were already under enquiry when I joined in 2005 and that Suo Motu had already settled and all about the retrospective legislation in the Padmore case I would have been able to make an informed decison about proceeding
        As it was this information was not disclosed to me and I believe this was professsional negligence on one or both their parts.
        Judge Parker certainly thought we should have been aware of the history, so our advisors certainly should have know and warned us.
        If we eventially lose the case it seems like a prima facia case of professioanl negligence to me
        [B]Unfortunately if you wait till the outcome of the Huitson Case you will be "timed out" by the "statute of limitations".

        Definition of Class Action - a lawsuit brought by a representative member of a large group of people on behalf of all members of the group
        Definition of Group Litigation - a Group Litigation Order can be made in any Claim where there are multiple parties or Claimants to the same cause of action. The Order will provide for the case management of claims which give rise to common or related issues of fact or law.

        Comment


          ^
          |
          |

          Think, then ignore!!!

          Comment


            I see Jones is back like a bad case of indigestion.

            Wonder if he will be passing notes to HMRC this time around.

            Sorry, couldn't resist
            Last edited by SantaClaus; 22 October 2010, 13:10.
            'Orwell's 1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual'. -
            Nick Pickles, director of Big Brother Watch.

            Comment


              I think he's drunk again.

              Comment


                For info

                One of the judges has changed.

                Case Tracker for Civil Appeals

                Previously

                LORD JUSTICE MUMMERY
                LADY JUSTICE SMITH
                LORD JUSTICE TOMLINSON

                Now

                LORD JUSTICE MUMMERY
                LORD JUSTICE SULLIVAN
                LORD JUSTICE TOMLINSON

                Comment


                  Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View Post
                  One of the judges has changed.

                  Case Tracker for Civil Appeals

                  Previously

                  LORD JUSTICE MUMMERY
                  LADY JUSTICE SMITH
                  LORD JUSTICE TOMLINSON

                  Now

                  LORD JUSTICE MUMMERY
                  LORD JUSTICE SULLIVAN
                  LORD JUSTICE TOMLINSON
                  DR, think I know the answer to this but anyway of finding out why?? Do you know if thats a good thing..

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View Post
                    One of the judges has changed.

                    Case Tracker for Civil Appeals

                    Previously

                    LORD JUSTICE MUMMERY
                    LADY JUSTICE SMITH
                    LORD JUSTICE TOMLINSON

                    Now

                    LORD JUSTICE MUMMERY
                    LORD JUSTICE SULLIVAN
                    LORD JUSTICE TOMLINSON
                    BBC NEWS | Politics | Profile: Sir Jeremy Sullivan

                    Is it this guy?

                    Not afraid to give Ministers a

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Cosmo View Post
                      BBC NEWS | Politics | Profile: Sir Jeremy Sullivan

                      Is it this guy?

                      Not afraid to give Ministers a
                      Yes.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X