Sorry to be thick but how does the PAYE cockup and Hartnetts downfall help us?
							
						
					- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
 - Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
 
BN66 - Round 2 (Court of Appeal)
				
					Collapse
				
			
		
	This topic is closed.
				
				
				
				X
X
					Collapse
				
				
				
					
					
						
						
					
					
						
							
						
					
				
				
				
								
								
								Topic is closed
								
							
						
						
					
					
					
					
				- 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
It doesn't really. It's just nice to see that arrogant bastard being brought down a peg or two.Originally posted by Donnie Darko View PostSorry to be thick but how does the PAYE cockup and Hartnetts downfall help us?
In some ways the PAYE cockup actually works against us because, despite the fact that like BN66 it's all a result HMRC's own incompetence, the Government are broadly supporting them.
However, hopefully the Treasury Committee might heap a load of criticism on them.Comment
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
Hartnett & Co are up before the Treasury Committee this morning. The "interrogation" started at 10.30.
PlayerComment
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
they apparently do cost benefit analysis against trying to recoup revenue, could have fooled me!!!Comment
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
Why does the first post say updates in Red and last update 10th September when nothing is highlighted in RED?Regards
Slobbo
"Everyone is entitled to be stupid, but some abuse the privilege."Comment
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
.........following an outcry over its handling of the matter
HMRC backs down over interest on tax overpayments - Telegraph
"HM Revenue and Customs has backed down over plans to charge interest on money wrongly refunded to taxpayers, following an outcry over its handling of the matter"
HHHMMMM .... If only it became public how they handled our matter !!!SAY NO TO RETROSPECTIVE TAXComment
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
Fascinating! I'm sure that we were told that interest was a matter of statute and that HMRC had no discretion or powers to waive interest charges...?Originally posted by zippo View PostHMRC backs down over interest on tax overpayments - Telegraph
"HM Revenue and Customs has backed down over plans to charge interest on money wrongly refunded to taxpayers, following an outcry over its handling of the matter"
HHHMMMM .... If only it became public how they handled our matter !!!Comment
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
Actually, Slobbo, the word "red" is highlighted in red and so is the date.Originally posted by Slobbo View PostWhy does the first post say updates in Red and last update 10th September when nothing is highlighted in RED?
Personally, I was puzzled as to why the whole phrase "(any new updates will be highlighted in red)" was not highlighted in red....
							
						Comment
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
A new concession will mean many people facing the highest demands for back-tax will not face interest payments.
Those given time to pay more than £2,000 in underpaid tax will now have interest waived - in line with those with smaller demands, MPs were told.
Do we have a precedent set here? Can we legally demand equal treatment?Comment
 - 
	
	
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	
sounds like it to me!!!! interesting, so there is no legal obligation for HMRC to charge it...Originally posted by helen7 View PostA new concession will mean many people facing the highest demands for back-tax will not face interest payments.
Those given time to pay more than £2,000 in underpaid tax will now have interest waived - in line with those with smaller demands, MPs were told.
Do we have a precedent set here? Can we legally demand equal treatment?
another interesting comment by Hartnett on answering a question about can people pay over longer than 3 years...Hartnett: Yes, we have procedures called Time to pay in place that can be used where appropriate
hmmmmmLast edited by smalldog; 15 September 2010, 16:02.Comment
 
								
								
								Topic is closed
								
							
						
					
					
					
				- Home
 - News & Features
 - First Timers
 - IR35 / S660 / BN66
 - Employee Benefit Trusts
 - Agency Workers Regulations
 - MSC Legislation
 - Limited Companies
 - Dividends
 - Umbrella Company
 - VAT / Flat Rate VAT
 - Job News & Guides
 - Money News & Guides
 - Guide to Contracts
 - Successful Contracting
 - Contracting Overseas
 - Contractor Calculators
 - MVL
 - Contractor Expenses
 
Advertisers

				
				
				
				
Comment