Originally posted by helen7
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
BN66 - Round 2 (Court of Appeal)
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
Topic is closed
-
-
Originally posted by Overwhelmed View PostYes it did, lost in the Court of AppealComment
-
Originally posted by Overwhelmed View PostYes it did, lost in the Court of Appeal
(NB. RDS stands for Relevant Discounted Security)
Tax judges blockComment
-
Originally posted by smalldog View Posthow did the scheme work and why did they lose??? Are there any similarities to our case??Comment
-
Election
Heres hoping that Timms doesn't get elected again! Anyone from East Ham?
Wonder what he will do will if he is not elected, go back to Logica?Politicians are wonderfull people, as long as they stay away from things they don't understand, like working for a living!Comment
-
-
My local MP is now Tory, might pop him a letter congratulating him on his win and also telling my BN66 storyPoliticians are wonderfull people, as long as they stay away from things they don't understand, like working for a living!Comment
-
Originally posted by portseven View PostMy local MP is now Tory, might pop him a letter congratulating him on his win and also telling my BN66 story
A couple of us have already drafted a letter template, and I am also in contact with Montp about this.Comment
-
Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View PostNo relation to our scheme, and completely different points of law.Comment
-
Originally posted by Overwhelmed View PostNot entirely different I think, judgement turned on scheme must stand up to commercial scrutiny, although this is not mentioned in the law. MontP had an identical scheme. Their letter of yesterday acknowledges KPMG case, and simply instructs to pay HMRC.
normal route via the commissioners, and did not jump straight in with a change in the law.Comment
Topic is closed
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Comment