Originally posted by Emigre
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
BN66 - JR Judgement Day
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
Topic is closed
-
-
I wonder when the tories win the next election if there is any chance they would repeal this, didnt Cameron come down on our side of the fence re the retrospection??? IF appeal takes that long we might have time on our side with a new government
lottery tickets bought....Last edited by smalldog; 28 January 2010, 14:27.Comment
-
[QUOTE=Emigre;1058538]If an appeal is not accepted in the UK Courts ie we have exhausted every domestic option available, I believe we can appeal to the European Courts.
Does someone want to knock up a process diagram/decision tree?[/QUOTE]
Cheers Emigre. That is what i suspected.
I don't think anyone here should put that together I expect it to be in the MTM comms.Comment
-
Originally posted by WhatEver View PostPerfectly put. Does anyone know if there's a BBC link to complain?
Yes send it to Raymond Snoddy on Newswatch.Comment
-
Its all over the press now
At least it has finally hit the mainstream
Google Huitson - New results for huitson
http://news.google.com/news/story?cl...ed=0CCQQqgIwCgComment
-
Originally posted by TaxDude View PostAt least it has finally hit the mainstream
Google Huitson - New results for huitson
http://news.google.com/news/story?cl...ed=0CCQQqgIwCg
http://www.contractoruk.com/news/004725.htmlSunt Lacrimae RerumComment
-
Originally posted by Tax_shouldnt_be_taxing View PostTo the BBC
Please ensure you take full account of what you publish. I think fair and unbiased reporting should also take the following into account. Please update your news page to reflect this:
All the taxpayers involved in the scheme declared the grounds for tax relief on every single tax return. Total transparency, not dodging as you put it.
In 2002, HMRC wrote a Technical Exchange (TE63) available under FoI which states that due to a technicality, HMRC were unlikely to claim the tax against the scheme.
HMRC planned to litigate 4 test cases as would be proper and normal. However, they never did. Instead, the Government brought in "BN66" in 2008 to apply retrospective legislation.
BN66 to quote it directly, "clarifies" earlier legislation in support of the retrospection. Which means it was not previously clear.
Even during the Parliamentary debating stages, many MP's were concerned over the retrospective element.
Not a single person using this scheme ever hid their financial affairs from HMRC.
The quote you have for the impact on people only relates to a sample of less than 100 out of more that 2500. You should emphasise this point as your commentary suggests that only a handful of people are badly affected by this.
Do not lump these people in the same boat as those who keep their finances secret.
ive forwarded this to
http://news.bbc.co.uk/newswatch/ukfs...00/3993909.stmWhen is comes to the HMRC and Gordy. Im a fighter not a loverComment
-
Originally posted by deckster View PostThis I am not doing. I can't afford to pay my demand. One way or another, if we lose I am going to be bankrupt. I'm not going to be any less bankrupt if I save like a monk for the few years. I'm buggered if I'm going to live like a pauper until this is resolved.Comment
-
Originally posted by Ratican View PostIncluding this one:
http://www.contractoruk.com/news/004725.htmlThe judge even hinted that they kidded themselves, and said they could have ‘brought the issue to a head’ by appealing closure notices, or by settling up with HMRC.Comment
-
Originally posted by javadude View PostI'm yet another lurker very appreciative of the comments posted by those who attended the hearing.
I don't agree with the judges comment that we were all warned that the scheme doesn't work by HMRC. The only letter I've had from HMRC on the subject was about a month ago.
I don't have the money to pay HMRC now even if I wanted to so I see no point worrying about it until the game is over. It seems like that is a long way off so I agree with the "Don't panic!" comments for now.
As for the 'dont panic' comments well, each to their own. This has been hanging over me for 8 or 9 years. I keep being told by MP (and others) 'dont worry, our case is sound and we'll win'!
And guess what? We just ******* lost.
Yeah, no panic at all!I couldn't give two fornicators! Yes, really!Comment
Topic is closed
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Reports of umbrella companies’ death are greatly exaggerated Yesterday 10:11
- A new hiring fraud hinges on a limited company, a passport and ‘Ade’ Nov 27 09:21
- Is an unpaid umbrella company required to pay contractors? Nov 26 09:28
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Nov 25 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
Comment